xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Praveen Kumar <kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: tim@xen.org, sstabellini@kernel.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
	George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	dario.faggioli@citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/17] rbtree: changes to inline coding conventions with Linux tree
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:37:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500008861.13834.8.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <595B6CC8020000780016848E@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 02:24 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On 03.07.17 at 21:58, <kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The patch inlines the rbtree related files to Linux coding
> > conventions to have
> > limited conflicts in future while porting from Linux tree.
> 
> "inlines" has a different meaning most of the time - how about
> "brings in line" (but I'll be happy to be corrected by a native
> speaker)? This would then also call for a change to the subject.
> 
> What I'm missing though is a reference to the Linux version to
> compare with - this is especially relevant because the format
> the patch brings the code into is not normal Linux style (but I
> do see that e.g. in 3.0 such oddities indeed existed).
> 
Jan,

Is it ok to add the last reference from Linux tree, which has already
been ported to Xen code base till date, so that we can diff from start
and verify that its only coding style changed and not anything else ?

> Also please state explicitly whether what you do are _only_
> style changes, making quite a bit of a difference to the level
> of review needed.

Sure, will update the same. Thanks.
> 
> Jan
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-14  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-03 19:58 [PATCH v4 00/17] xen: common: rbtree: ported updates from Linux tree Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] rbtree: changes to inline coding conventions with " Praveen Kumar
2017-07-04  8:24   ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-04  8:39     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-07-14  5:07     ` Praveen Kumar [this message]
2017-07-14 10:18       ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] rbtree: remove redundant if()-condition in rb_erase() Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] rbtree: empty nodes have no color Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] rbtree: move some implementation details from rbtree.h to rbtree.c Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] rbtree: break out of rb_insert_color loop after tree rotation Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] rbtree: adjust root color in rb_insert_color() only when necessary Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] rbtree: low level optimizations in rb_insert_color() Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] rbtree: adjust node color in __rb_erase_color() only when necessary Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] rbtree: optimize case selection logic in __rb_erase_color() Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] rbtree: low level optimizations " Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] rbtree: coding style adjustments Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] rbtree: optimize fetching of sibling node Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] rbtree: add __rb_change_child() helper function Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] rbtree: place easiest case first in rb_erase() Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] rbtree: handle 1-child recoloring in rb_erase() instead of rb_erase_color() Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] rbtree: low level optimizations in rb_erase() Praveen Kumar
2017-07-03 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] rbtree: fix typo in comment of rb_insert_color Praveen Kumar
2017-07-04  8:27 ` [PATCH v4 00/17] xen: common: rbtree: ported updates from Linux tree Jan Beulich
2017-07-04  8:45   ` Dario Faggioli
2017-07-14  4:58     ` Praveen Kumar
2017-07-04  8:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-07-04  9:14   ` Praveen Kumar
2017-07-14  4:53     ` Praveen Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1500008861.13834.8.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).