From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH for-4.10] common/spinlock: Improve the output from check_lock() if it trips
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:49:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509446950-28463-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> (raw)
If check_lock() triggers, a crash will occur. Instead of simply identifying
"the irq context was different", indicate the expected and current irq
context.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
check_lock() only exists in debug builds, which makes this a low risk change
for 4.10.
---
xen/common/spinlock.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/common/spinlock.c b/xen/common/spinlock.c
index 44b07b7..8f2ba08 100644
--- a/xen/common/spinlock.c
+++ b/xen/common/spinlock.c
@@ -44,7 +44,13 @@ static void check_lock(struct lock_debug *debug)
if ( unlikely(debug->irq_safe != irq_safe) )
{
int seen = cmpxchg(&debug->irq_safe, -1, irq_safe);
- BUG_ON(seen == !irq_safe);
+
+ if ( seen == !irq_safe )
+ {
+ printk("CHECKLOCK FAILURE: prev irqsafe: %d, curr irqsafe %d\n",
+ seen, irq_safe);
+ BUG();
+ }
}
}
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-31 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-31 10:49 Andrew Cooper [this message]
2017-10-31 10:52 ` [PATCH for-4.10] common/spinlock: Improve the output from check_lock() if it trips Wei Liu
2017-10-31 10:53 ` George Dunlap
2017-11-02 13:52 ` Julien Grall
2017-11-06 11:09 ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-13 16:05 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1509446950-28463-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).