xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: jgross@suse.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, sstabellini@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xen/pvcalls: fix potential endless loop in pvcalls-front.c
Date: Mon,  6 Nov 2017 14:17:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1510006679-6381-1-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org> (raw)

mutex_trylock() returns 1 if you take the lock and 0 if not. Assume you
take in_mutex on the first try, but you can't take out_mutex. Next times
you call mutex_trylock() in_mutex is going to fail. It's an endless
loop.

Solve the problem by moving the two mutex_trylock calls to two separate
loops.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
CC: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
CC: jgross@suse.com
---
 drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
index 0c1ec68..047dce7 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
@@ -1048,8 +1048,9 @@ int pvcalls_front_release(struct socket *sock)
 		 * is set to NULL -- we only need to wait for the existing
 		 * waiters to return.
 		 */
-		while (!mutex_trylock(&map->active.in_mutex) ||
-			   !mutex_trylock(&map->active.out_mutex))
+		while (!mutex_trylock(&map->active.in_mutex))
+			cpu_relax();
+		while (!mutex_trylock(&map->active.out_mutex))
 			cpu_relax();
 
 		pvcalls_front_free_map(bedata, map);
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2017-11-06 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-06 22:17 Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2017-11-06 22:34 ` [PATCH] xen/pvcalls: fix potential endless loop in pvcalls-front.c Boris Ostrovsky
2017-11-06 22:38   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-11-07  5:44 ` Juergen Gross
2017-11-10 23:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-11-11  2:02     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-11-13 18:30       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-11-13 15:15     ` Juergen Gross
2017-11-13 18:33       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-11-14  9:11         ` Juergen Gross
2017-11-14 21:46           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-11-15  8:14             ` Juergen Gross
2017-11-15 19:09               ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-11-15 19:50                 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-11-15 19:53                   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-11-15 21:20                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-11-15 21:50                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-11-15 21:51                       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-11-15 21:54                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-11-16  5:28                     ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1510006679-6381-1-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).