xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>
To: "JBeulich@suse.com" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	"raistlin@linux.it" <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"anshul.makkar@citrix.com" <anshul.makkar@citrix.com>,
	"jun.nakajima@intel.com" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] VMX: fix VMCS race on context-switch paths
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:36:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1510223780.3654.1.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A043944020000780018D7B6@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 03:17 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 09.11.17 at 10:54, <raistlin@linux.it> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 14:24 +0000, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> > > Perhaps I should improve my diagram:
> > > 
> > > pCPU1: vCPUx of domain X -> migrate to pCPU2 -> switch to idle
> > > context
> > > -> RCU callbacks -> vcpu_destroy(vCPUy of domain Y) ->
> > > vmx_vcpu_disable_pml() -> vmx_vmcs_clear() (VMCS is trashed at this
> > > point on pCPU1)
> > > 
> > > pCPU2: context switch into vCPUx -> vCPUx.is_running = 1 -> TLB flush
> > > from context switch to clean TLB on pCPU1
> > > 
> > 
> > Sorry, there must be something I'm missing (or misunderstanding).
> > 
> > What is this code that checks is_running and triggers the TLB flush?
> 
> I don't see where Igor said is_running is being checked around a
> TLB flush. The TLB flush itself is what happens first thing in
> context_switch() (and it's really using the TLB flush interface to
> mainly effect the state flush, with the TLB flush being an implied
> side effect; I've already got a series of further patches to make
> this less implicit).
> 
> > But, more important, how come you are context switching to something
> > that has is_running == 1 ? That should not be possible.
> 
> That's not what Igor's diagram says - it's indicating the fact that
> is_running is being set to 1 in the process of context switching
> into vCPUx.

Jan, Dario,

Igor was referring to the following situation:


pCPU1                                   pCPU2
=====                                   =====
current == vCPU1
context_switch(next == idle)
!! __context_switch() is skipped
vcpu_migrate(vCPU1)
RCU callbacks
vmx_vcpu_destroy()
vmx_vcpu_disable_pml()
current_vmcs = 0

                                        schedule(next == vCPU1)
                                        vCPU1->is_running = 1;
                                        context_switch(next == vCPU1)
                                        flush_tlb_mask(&dirty_mask);
                                    
                                <--- IPI

__sync_local_execstate()
__context_switch(prev == vCPU1)
vmx_ctxt_switch_from(vCPU1)
vCPU1->is_running == 1
!! vmx_vmcs_reload() is skipped


I hope that this better illustrates the root cause.

-- 
Thanks,
Sergey
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-09 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-16 11:10 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: context switch handling adjustments Jan Beulich
2017-02-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] VMX: fix VMCS race on context-switch paths Jan Beulich
2017-02-16 12:27   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-16 12:35     ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-17  3:48       ` Tian, Kevin
2017-02-17  8:40   ` Sergey Dyasli
2017-02-17  9:01     ` Jan Beulich
2017-10-27 17:42   ` Igor Druzhinin
2017-11-02 19:46     ` Igor Druzhinin
2017-11-07  8:07       ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-07 14:24         ` Igor Druzhinin
2017-11-07 14:55           ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-07 15:52             ` Igor Druzhinin
2017-11-07 16:31               ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-09 10:05               ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-09 10:36                 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-11-09 12:58                   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-09  9:54           ` Dario Faggioli
2017-11-09 10:17             ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-09 10:36               ` Sergey Dyasli [this message]
2017-11-09 11:01                 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-11-09 13:08                   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-09 14:16                     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-11-09 14:39                       ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-09 16:38                       ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-09 10:39               ` Dario Faggioli
2017-11-07 15:16         ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-16 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: package up context switch hook pointers Jan Beulich
2017-02-16 11:23   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-17  3:49   ` Tian, Kevin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1510223780.3654.1.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=anshul.makkar@citrix.com \
    --cc=igor.druzhinin@citrix.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=raistlin@linux.it \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).