From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6.5 20/26] x86: Protect unaware domains from meddling hyperthreads
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 00:15:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515024955-13390-21-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515024955-13390-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
v3:
* Spelling corrections
v4:
* Rebase over AMD changes
v6:
* Fix cpuid_policy_updated() to not corrupt vp->spec_ctrl.host on migrate, or
on older versions of Xen where feature flags start as 0 rather than the
domain maximum.
---
xen/arch/x86/domain.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
xen/arch/x86/msr.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h | 3 +++
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
index d383489..698346e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
@@ -2027,6 +2027,25 @@ int domain_relinquish_resources(struct domain *d)
*/
void cpuid_policy_updated(struct vcpu *v)
{
+ const struct cpuid_policy *cp = v->domain->arch.cpuid;
+ struct msr_vcpu_policy *vp = v->arch.msr;
+
+ /*
+ * For guests which know about IBRS but are not told about STIBP running
+ * on hardware supporting hyperthreading, the guest doesn't know to
+ * protect itself fully. (Such a guest won't be permitted direct access
+ * to the MSR.) Have Xen fill in the gaps, so an unaware guest can't be
+ * interfered with by a meddling guest on an adjacent hyperthread.
+ */
+ if ( cp->feat.ibrsb )
+ {
+ if ( !cp->feat.stibp && cpu_has_stibp &&
+ !(vp->spec_ctrl.guest & (SPEC_CTRL_IBRS | SPEC_CTRL_STIBP)) )
+ vp->spec_ctrl.host = SPEC_CTRL_STIBP;
+ else
+ vp->spec_ctrl.host = vp->spec_ctrl.guest;
+ }
+
if ( is_hvm_vcpu(v) )
hvm_cpuid_policy_changed(v);
}
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/msr.c b/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
index 697cc6e..2d99c64 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
@@ -181,7 +181,20 @@ int guest_wrmsr(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr, uint64_t val)
(cp->feat.stibp ? SPEC_CTRL_STIBP : 0)) )
goto gp_fault; /* Rsvd bit set? */
vp->spec_ctrl.guest = val;
- vp->spec_ctrl.host = val;
+
+ /*
+ * For guests which are not told about STIBP, running on hardware
+ * supporting hyperthreading, the guest doesn't know to protect itself
+ * fully. (Such a guest won't be permitted direct access to the MSR.)
+ * When IBRS is not in force, have Xen fill in the gaps, so an unaware
+ * guest can't be interfered with by a meddling guest on an adjacent
+ * hyperthread.
+ */
+ if ( !cp->feat.stibp && cpu_has_stibp &&
+ !(val & (SPEC_CTRL_IBRS | SPEC_CTRL_STIBP)) )
+ vp->spec_ctrl.host = SPEC_CTRL_STIBP;
+ else
+ vp->spec_ctrl.host = val;
break;
case MSR_PRED_CMD:
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h
index adc333f..988a834 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h
@@ -100,6 +100,9 @@
/* CPUID level 0x80000007.edx */
#define cpu_has_itsc boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ITSC)
+/* CPUID level 0x00000007:0.edx */
+#define cpu_has_stibp boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_STIBP)
+
/* Synthesized. */
#define cpu_has_arch_perfmon boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON)
#define cpu_has_cpuid_faulting boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CPUID_FAULTING)
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-04 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-04 0:15 [PATCH v6.5 00/26] x86: Mitigations for SP2/CVE-2017-5715/Branch Target Injection Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 01/26] x86/alt: Break out alternative-asm into a separate header file Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 02/26] x86/alt: Introduce ALTERNATIVE{, _2} macros Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 03/26] x86/hvm: Rename update_guest_vendor() callback to cpuid_policy_changed() Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 04/26] x86: Introduce a common cpuid_policy_updated() Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 05/26] x86/entry: Remove support for partial cpu_user_regs frames Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 8:51 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 06/26] x86/entry: Rearrange RESTORE_ALL to restore register in stack order Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 07/26] x86/hvm: Use SAVE_ALL to construct the cpu_user_regs frame after VMExit Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 08/26] x86/entry: Erase guest GPR state on entry to Xen Andrew Cooper
2018-01-22 10:04 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-22 10:18 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-22 10:27 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 09/26] x86: Support compiling with indirect branch thunks Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 9:02 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 10/26] common/wait: Clarifications to wait infrastructure Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 11/26] x86: Support indirect thunks from assembly code Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 9:23 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-08 18:24 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-09 8:36 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-09 11:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-09 13:18 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-11 13:03 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-11 13:41 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-11 13:46 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 12/26] x86/boot: Report details of speculative mitigations Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 9:29 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 13/26] x86/amd: Try to set lfence as being Dispatch Serialising Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 9:32 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-08 19:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-09 8:38 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 14/26] x86: Introduce alternative indirect thunks Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 9:40 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-09 11:44 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-09 13:24 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-09 13:30 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 15/26] x86/feature: Definitions for Indirect Branch Controls Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 1:14 ` Doug Goldstein
2018-01-04 1:16 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 4:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2018-01-04 9:42 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 18:51 ` Wei Liu
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 16/26] x86/cmdline: Introduce a command line option to disable IBRS/IBPB, STIBP and IBPB Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 9:43 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 17/26] x86/msr: Emulation of MSR_{SPEC_CTRL, PRED_CMD} for guests Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 18/26] x86/migrate: Move MSR_SPEC_CTRL on migrate Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 19/26] x86/hvm: Permit guests direct access to MSR_{SPEC_CTRL, PRED_CMD} Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 9:52 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-09 12:03 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-09 13:28 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-09 13:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-09 13:58 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 0:15 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2018-01-04 9:59 ` [PATCH v6.5 20/26] x86: Protect unaware domains from meddling hyperthreads Jan Beulich
2018-01-09 14:21 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-09 14:29 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 21/26] x86/entry: Use MSR_SPEC_CTRL at each entry/exit point Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 10:14 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 22/26] x86/boot: Calculate the most appropriate BTI mitigation to use Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 10:17 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 23/26] x86/entry: Clobber the Return Stack Buffer on entry to Xen Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 10:22 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 24/26] x86/ctxt: Issue a speculation barrier between vcpu contexts Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 10:25 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 25/26] x86/cpuid: Offer Indirect Branch Controls to guests Andrew Cooper
2018-01-09 11:44 ` Wei Liu
2018-01-04 0:15 ` [PATCH v6.5 26/26] x86/idle: Clear SPEC_CTRL while idle Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 10:29 ` Jan Beulich
2018-01-04 10:41 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1515024955-13390-21-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).