From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] make xen ocaml safe-strings compliant Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 11:06:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1518170760.5629.110.camel@suse.com> References: <1518112198.5629.68.camel@suse.com> <20180208180348.moi3fujoq22fkkqg@citrix.com> <20180208182400.g4qlkiaetnvqhuo6@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2523231114369907231==" Return-path: Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ek5Zj-0000IF-L2 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 10:06:35 +0000 In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Christian Lindig , Wei Liu Cc: Marcello Seri , Xen-devel , David Scott , John Thomson , Michael Young List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============2523231114369907231== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SSY1Tp3hTTrxqUztwb6D" --=-SSY1Tp3hTTrxqUztwb6D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 09:20 +0000, Christian Lindig wrote: > > On 8. Feb 2018, at 18:24, Wei Liu wrote: > >=20 > > Christian, do you have any idea when you can look into fixing the > > safe-string patch? >=20 > Sorry, I can=E2=80=99t make a promise because of my other obligations. I = do > wonder, though: this patch did not come out of nowhere but supposedly > was working - what is different here? >=20 Well, the only thing that I know about OCAML is that it is, for me as an Italian, a word a little bit difficult to pronounce. :-D But I'm happy to try to give some more details on what fails and how, if you direct me. :-) The testbox where this happens is a Debian unstable which has ocaml 4.05.0-10. > In any case, I will reproduce the problem and take a look. >=20 Andrew said on IRC that he's seen something similar happening on some of yours XenRT runs... but really, I'm happy to provide more info. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Software Engineer @ SUSE https://www.suse.com/ --=-SSY1Tp3hTTrxqUztwb6D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEES5ssOj3Vhr0WPnOLFkJ4iaW4c+4FAlp9cogACgkQFkJ4iaW4 c+7NWw//XZag7JAX5wyf140T+aTgDrsHoobsx8UtSolplOjQOj01X8ciwDr/S9SV 9tWCE75UZpdEvA1kGx3H+3iGxa942xADnacBDEtRLJ7aCKIQ4MzEGV9xORMJb4ub dsF62ppZbcWux0+xXe75E1hHfjBUsESa2HiJcWFCsB1Aq0ygJ7fZwUVA0lh6dpkJ iLbHF9Wbr29sKnfHEcUuehQDDwNGJJKRXPQ6gRkMv4leo2yg4dawOZ+0G1QmAamu leHJuhO4eVylbQ5B0kQjMKOvwAsztMwWO4kVPerl6wVNSBx6V/JhNNxGovAlR8Xc P1mTVsChuT8/3lCckocJx8FxPeiv598oXDPaNMJbedGxWob5PmoxDG59buP1wJrX oyclv06LhBnsFqZ0ZHSEm8RiED6oQ8pcs/H4sU7e8pBO8A7yn2KhHdJ+i+yf0+8j zG+qlpKzL2IDjgrO4EvbcMKSNDBSr7GvQ7u8Pd+oRNq962U1uzx25kt2caF4J5eH iwM4asHKavSvS2NLczo7pdudoiXMxu3dJAgQCo8jld88Gsg2VOg4wozUC2IAxLkG ikTH1HBT7ozWqoOrow9Eqy99txTpqwDwgP7BeU4FGhC9cg595Bfg/GRlQIXOwH2q 0UMKnr7oOSJrE50QCM/oiv7yKKWczPL0g8BHZFvq8DWcWqbk3DU= =jSoC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SSY1Tp3hTTrxqUztwb6D-- --===============2523231114369907231== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVucHJvamVjdC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0 cy54ZW5wcm9qZWN0Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3hlbi1kZXZlbA== --===============2523231114369907231==--