xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: "Sergey Dyasli" <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>,
	"Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"Chao Gao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 09/12] microcode: remove struct microcode_info
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:57:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1552291056-20286-10-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552291056-20286-1-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com>

Struct microcode_info is useless now. microcode pointer and size inside
it were passed to other CPUs to parse microcode locally. Now, parsing
microcode blob is done on one of CPUs. Other CPUs needn't parse the
microcode blob; the pointer and size can be removed.

The 'cpu' field is also redundent because it always can be inferred from
current cpu id.

Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
---
v6:
 - remove the whole microcode_info instead of two fields of it.
---
 xen/arch/x86/microcode.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
index e4e2e74..c510808 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
@@ -188,13 +188,6 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(microcode_mutex);
 
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_signature, cpu_sig);
 
-struct microcode_info {
-    unsigned int cpu;
-    uint32_t buffer_size;
-    int error;
-    char buffer[1];
-};
-
 /*
  * Save an ucode patch to the global cache list.
  *
@@ -291,30 +284,25 @@ static int microcode_update_cpu(void)
     return ret;
 }
 
-static long do_microcode_update(void *_info)
+static long do_microcode_update(void *unused)
 {
-    struct microcode_info *info = _info;
-    int error;
-
-    BUG_ON(info->cpu != smp_processor_id());
+    int error, cpu;
 
     error = microcode_update_cpu();
     if ( error )
-        info->error = error;
+        return error;
 
-    info->cpu = cpumask_next(info->cpu, &cpu_online_map);
-    if ( info->cpu < nr_cpu_ids )
-        return continue_hypercall_on_cpu(info->cpu, do_microcode_update, info);
+    cpu = cpumask_next(smp_processor_id(), &cpu_online_map);
+    if ( cpu < nr_cpu_ids )
+        return continue_hypercall_on_cpu(cpu, do_microcode_update, NULL);
 
-    error = info->error;
-    xfree(info);
     return error;
 }
 
 int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) buf, unsigned long len)
 {
     int ret;
-    struct microcode_info *info;
+    void *buffer;
 
     if ( len != (uint32_t)len )
         return -E2BIG;
@@ -322,40 +310,40 @@ int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) buf, unsigned long len)
     if ( microcode_ops == NULL )
         return -EINVAL;
 
-    info = xmalloc_bytes(sizeof(*info) + len);
-    if ( info == NULL )
-        return -ENOMEM;
+    buffer = xmalloc_bytes(len);
+    if ( !buffer )
+    {
+        ret = -ENOMEM;
+        goto free;
+    }
 
-    ret = copy_from_guest(info->buffer, buf, len);
-    if ( ret != 0 )
+    if ( copy_from_guest(buffer, buf, len) )
     {
-        xfree(info);
-        return ret;
+        ret = -EFAULT;
+        goto free;
     }
 
     if ( microcode_ops->start_update )
     {
         ret = microcode_ops->start_update();
         if ( ret != 0 )
-        {
-            xfree(info);
-            return ret;
-        }
+            goto free;
     }
 
-    ret = microcode_parse_blob(info->buffer, len);
+    ret = microcode_parse_blob(buffer, len);
     if ( ret <= 0 )
     {
         printk(XENLOG_ERR "No valid or newer ucode found. Update abort!\n");
-        xfree(info);
-        return -EINVAL;
+        ret = -EINVAL;
+        goto free;
     }
 
-    info->buffer_size = len;
-    info->error = 0;
-    info->cpu = cpumask_first(&cpu_online_map);
+    return continue_hypercall_on_cpu(cpumask_first(&cpu_online_map),
+                                     do_microcode_update, NULL);
 
-    return continue_hypercall_on_cpu(info->cpu, do_microcode_update, info);
+ free:
+    xfree(buffer);
+    return ret;
 }
 
 static int __init microcode_init(void)
-- 
1.8.3.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-11  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-11  7:57 [PATCH v6 00/12] improve late microcode loading Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] misc/xenmicrocode: Upload a microcode blob to the hypervisor Chao Gao
2019-03-12 15:27   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-13  5:05     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-13  9:24   ` Wei Liu
2019-03-25  9:38   ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-04-02  2:26     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] microcode/intel: use union to get fields without shifting and masking Chao Gao
2019-03-12 15:33   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-12 16:43     ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-12 18:23       ` Wei Liu
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] microcode/intel: extend microcode_update_match() Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] microcode: introduce a global cache of ucode patch Chao Gao
2019-03-12 16:53   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-12 23:31     ` Raj, Ashok
2019-03-13  5:28     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-13  7:39     ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-13 10:30       ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-13 17:04         ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-14  7:42           ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-13 16:36   ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-03-14  1:39     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] microcode: only save compatible ucode patches Chao Gao
2019-03-12 17:03   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-13  7:45     ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] microcode: remove struct ucode_cpu_info Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] microcode: remove pointless 'cpu' parameter Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] microcode: split out apply_microcode() from cpu_request_microcode() Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode Chao Gao
2019-03-21 11:08   ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading Chao Gao
2019-03-13  0:07   ` Raj, Ashok
2019-03-13  5:02     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-13  7:54       ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-13  8:02         ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-14 12:39           ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-14 18:57             ` Raj, Ashok
2019-03-14 20:25               ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-15  9:40                 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-15 10:44                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-14 13:01           ` Chao Gao
2019-03-14 13:08             ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] microcode: update microcode on cores in parallel Chao Gao
2019-03-21 12:24   ` [RFC PATCH v6 13/12] microcode: add sequential application policy Sergey Dyasli
2019-03-21 14:25     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-26 16:23     ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-19 20:22 ` [PATCH v6 00/12] improve late microcode loading Woods, Brian
2019-03-19 21:39   ` Woods, Brian
2019-03-20  8:58     ` Chao Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1552291056-20286-10-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).