xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: "Sergey Dyasli" <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>,
	"Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"Chao Gao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 03/12] microcode/intel: extend microcode_update_match()
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:57:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1552291056-20286-4-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552291056-20286-1-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com>

to a more generic function. Then, this function can compare two given
microcodes' signature/revision as well. Comparing two microcodes is
used to update the global microcode cache (introduced by the later
patches in this series) when a new microcode is given.

Note that enum microcode_match_result will be used in common code
(aka microcode.c), it has been placed in the common header.

Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
---
Changes in v6:
 - eliminate unnecessary type casting in microcode_update_match
 - check if a patch has an extend header

Changes in v5:
 - constify the extended_signature
 - use named enum type for the return value of microcode_update_match
---
 xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c  | 48 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
index 22fdeca..ecec83b 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
@@ -134,14 +134,28 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
     return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int microcode_update_match(
-    unsigned int cpu_num, const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header,
-    int sig, int pf)
+static enum microcode_match_result microcode_update_match(
+    const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header, unsigned int sig,
+    unsigned int pf, unsigned int rev)
 {
-    struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu_num);
+    const struct extended_sigtable *ext_header;
+    const struct extended_signature *ext_sig;
+    unsigned long data_size = get_datasize(mc_header);
+    unsigned int i;
+
+    if ( sigmatch(sig, mc_header->sig, pf, mc_header->pf) )
+        return (mc_header->rev > rev) ? NEW_UCODE : OLD_UCODE;
 
-    return (sigmatch(sig, uci->cpu_sig.sig, pf, uci->cpu_sig.pf) &&
-            (mc_header->rev > uci->cpu_sig.rev));
+    if ( get_totalsize(mc_header) == (data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE) )
+        return MIS_UCODE;
+
+    ext_header = (const void *)(mc_header + 1) + data_size;
+    ext_sig = (const void *)(ext_header + 1);
+    for ( i = 0; i < ext_header->count; i++ )
+        if ( sigmatch(sig, ext_sig[i].sig, pf, ext_sig[i].pf) )
+            return (mc_header->rev > rev) ? NEW_UCODE : OLD_UCODE;
+
+    return MIS_UCODE;
 }
 
 static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc)
@@ -243,31 +257,13 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(const void *mc, unsigned int cpu)
 {
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu);
     const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header = mc;
-    const struct extended_sigtable *ext_header;
     unsigned long total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
-    int ext_sigcount, i;
-    struct extended_signature *ext_sig;
     void *new_mc;
 
-    if ( microcode_update_match(cpu, mc_header,
-                                mc_header->sig, mc_header->pf) )
-        goto find;
-
-    if ( total_size <= (get_datasize(mc_header) + MC_HEADER_SIZE) )
+    if ( microcode_update_match(mc, uci->cpu_sig.sig, uci->cpu_sig.pf,
+                                uci->cpu_sig.rev) != NEW_UCODE )
         return 0;
 
-    ext_header = mc + get_datasize(mc_header) + MC_HEADER_SIZE;
-    ext_sigcount = ext_header->count;
-    ext_sig = (void *)ext_header + EXT_HEADER_SIZE;
-    for ( i = 0; i < ext_sigcount; i++ )
-    {
-        if ( microcode_update_match(cpu, mc_header,
-                                    ext_sig->sig, ext_sig->pf) )
-            goto find;
-        ext_sig++;
-    }
-    return 0;
- find:
     pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode update with"
              " version %#x (current=%#x)\n",
              cpu, mc_header->rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev);
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
index 23ea954..73ebe9a 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
@@ -3,6 +3,12 @@
 
 #include <xen/percpu.h>
 
+enum microcode_match_result {
+    OLD_UCODE, /* signature matched, but revision id isn't newer */
+    NEW_UCODE, /* signature matched, but revision id is newer */
+    MIS_UCODE, /* signature mismatched */
+};
+
 struct cpu_signature;
 struct ucode_cpu_info;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-11  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-11  7:57 [PATCH v6 00/12] improve late microcode loading Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] misc/xenmicrocode: Upload a microcode blob to the hypervisor Chao Gao
2019-03-12 15:27   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-13  5:05     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-13  9:24   ` Wei Liu
2019-03-25  9:38   ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-04-02  2:26     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] microcode/intel: use union to get fields without shifting and masking Chao Gao
2019-03-12 15:33   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-12 16:43     ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-12 18:23       ` Wei Liu
2019-03-11  7:57 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] microcode: introduce a global cache of ucode patch Chao Gao
2019-03-12 16:53   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-12 23:31     ` Raj, Ashok
2019-03-13  5:28     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-13  7:39     ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-13 10:30       ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-13 17:04         ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-14  7:42           ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-13 16:36   ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-03-14  1:39     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] microcode: only save compatible ucode patches Chao Gao
2019-03-12 17:03   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-13  7:45     ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] microcode: remove struct ucode_cpu_info Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] microcode: remove pointless 'cpu' parameter Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] microcode: split out apply_microcode() from cpu_request_microcode() Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] microcode: remove struct microcode_info Chao Gao
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode Chao Gao
2019-03-21 11:08   ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading Chao Gao
2019-03-13  0:07   ` Raj, Ashok
2019-03-13  5:02     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-13  7:54       ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-13  8:02         ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-14 12:39           ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-14 18:57             ` Raj, Ashok
2019-03-14 20:25               ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-15  9:40                 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-15 10:44                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-14 13:01           ` Chao Gao
2019-03-14 13:08             ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-11  7:57 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] microcode: update microcode on cores in parallel Chao Gao
2019-03-21 12:24   ` [RFC PATCH v6 13/12] microcode: add sequential application policy Sergey Dyasli
2019-03-21 14:25     ` Chao Gao
2019-03-26 16:23     ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-19 20:22 ` [PATCH v6 00/12] improve late microcode loading Woods, Brian
2019-03-19 21:39   ` Woods, Brian
2019-03-20  8:58     ` Chao Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1552291056-20286-4-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).