From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: "Sergey Dyasli" <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"Chao Gao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 08/12] microcode: split out apply_microcode() from cpu_request_microcode()
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:57:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1552291056-20286-9-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552291056-20286-1-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com>
During late microcode update, apply_microcode() is invoked in
cpu_request_microcode(). To make late microcode update more reliable,
we want to put the apply_microcode() into stop_machine context. So
we split out it from cpu_request_microcode(). As a consequence,
apply_microcode() should be invoked explicitly in the common code.
Also with the global ucode cache, microcode parsing only needs
to be done once; cpu_request_microcode() is also moved out of
microcode_update_cpu().
On AMD side, svm_host_osvw_init() is supposed to be called after
microcode update. As apply_micrcode() won't be called by
cpu_request_microcode() now, svm_host_osvw_init() is moved to the
end of apply_microcode().
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
---
Changes in v6:
- during early microcode update, BSP and APs call different functions.
Thus AP can bypass parsing microcode blob.
---
xen/arch/x86/acpi/power.c | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/microcode.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c | 19 +++++-----
xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c | 19 ++--------
xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c | 5 +--
xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h | 3 +-
6 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/power.c b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/power.c
index b4c3669..aeacb57 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/power.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/power.c
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int enter_state(u32 state)
console_end_sync();
- microcode_resume_cpu();
+ early_microcode_update_cpu();
if ( !recheck_cpu_features(0) )
panic("Missing previously available feature(s)\n");
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
index 8bfdf95..e4e2e74 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
@@ -261,38 +261,34 @@ const struct microcode_patch *microcode_find_patch(void)
return NULL;
}
-int microcode_resume_cpu(void)
+/*
+ * Return the number of ucode patch inserted to the global cache.
+ * Return a negtive value on error.
+ */
+static int microcode_parse_blob(char *buf, uint32_t len)
{
- int err;
- struct cpu_signature *sig = &this_cpu(cpu_sig);
-
- if ( !microcode_ops )
- return 0;
+ int ret;
spin_lock(µcode_mutex);
-
- err = microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(sig);
- if ( likely(!err) )
- err = microcode_ops->apply_microcode();
+ ret = microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(&this_cpu(cpu_sig));
+ if ( likely(!ret) )
+ ret = microcode_ops->cpu_request_microcode(buf, len);
spin_unlock(µcode_mutex);
- return err;
+ return ret;
}
-static int microcode_update_cpu(const void *buf, size_t size)
+static int microcode_update_cpu(void)
{
- int err;
- unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- struct cpu_signature *sig = &per_cpu(cpu_sig, cpu);
+ int ret;
spin_lock(µcode_mutex);
-
- err = microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(sig);
- if ( likely(!err) )
- err = microcode_ops->cpu_request_microcode(buf, size);
+ ret = microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(&this_cpu(cpu_sig));
+ if ( likely(!ret) )
+ ret = microcode_ops->apply_microcode();
spin_unlock(µcode_mutex);
- return err;
+ return ret;
}
static long do_microcode_update(void *_info)
@@ -302,7 +298,7 @@ static long do_microcode_update(void *_info)
BUG_ON(info->cpu != smp_processor_id());
- error = microcode_update_cpu(info->buffer, info->buffer_size);
+ error = microcode_update_cpu();
if ( error )
info->error = error;
@@ -337,10 +333,6 @@ int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) buf, unsigned long len)
return ret;
}
- info->buffer_size = len;
- info->error = 0;
- info->cpu = cpumask_first(&cpu_online_map);
-
if ( microcode_ops->start_update )
{
ret = microcode_ops->start_update();
@@ -351,6 +343,18 @@ int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) buf, unsigned long len)
}
}
+ ret = microcode_parse_blob(info->buffer, len);
+ if ( ret <= 0 )
+ {
+ printk(XENLOG_ERR "No valid or newer ucode found. Update abort!\n");
+ xfree(info);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ info->buffer_size = len;
+ info->error = 0;
+ info->cpu = cpumask_first(&cpu_online_map);
+
return continue_hypercall_on_cpu(info->cpu, do_microcode_update, info);
}
@@ -376,7 +380,16 @@ static int __init microcode_init(void)
}
__initcall(microcode_init);
-int __init early_microcode_update_cpu(bool start_update)
+int early_microcode_update_cpu(void)
+{
+ return microcode_ops ? microcode_update_cpu() : 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * BSP needs to parse the ucode blob and then apply an update.
+ * APs just apply an update by calling early_microcode_update_cpu().
+ */
+static int __init early_microcode_parse_and_update_cpu(void)
{
int rc = 0;
void *data = NULL;
@@ -394,13 +407,17 @@ int __init early_microcode_update_cpu(bool start_update)
}
if ( data )
{
- if ( start_update && microcode_ops->start_update )
+ if ( microcode_ops->start_update )
rc = microcode_ops->start_update();
if ( rc )
return rc;
- return microcode_update_cpu(data, len);
+ rc = microcode_parse_blob(data, len);
+ if ( rc <= 0 )
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return early_microcode_update_cpu();
}
else
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -419,8 +436,10 @@ int __init early_microcode_init(void)
return rc;
if ( microcode_ops )
+ {
if ( ucode_mod.mod_end || ucode_blob.size )
- rc = early_microcode_update_cpu(true);
+ rc = early_microcode_parse_and_update_cpu();
+ }
return rc;
}
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
index 25935dd..5c25ff2 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
@@ -293,6 +293,10 @@ static int apply_microcode(void)
sig->rev = rev;
+#ifdef CONFIG_HVM
+ svm_host_osvw_init();
+#endif
+
return 0;
}
@@ -459,6 +463,7 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(const void *buf, size_t bufsize)
unsigned int equiv_cpu_id;
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
const struct cpu_signature *sig = &per_cpu(cpu_sig, cpu);
+ unsigned int matched_cnt = 0;
current_cpu_id = cpuid_eax(0x00000001);
@@ -557,12 +562,8 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(const void *buf, size_t bufsize)
* this ucode patch before checking whether it matches with
* current CPU.
*/
- if ( microcode_save_patch(microcode_patch) && microcode_fits(mc_amd) )
- {
- error = apply_microcode();
- if ( error )
- break;
- }
+ if ( microcode_save_patch(microcode_patch) )
+ matched_cnt++;
if ( offset >= bufsize )
break;
@@ -593,17 +594,13 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(const void *buf, size_t bufsize)
}
out:
-#if CONFIG_HVM
- svm_host_osvw_init();
-#endif
-
/*
* In some cases we may return an error even if processor's microcode has
* been updated. For example, the first patch in a container file is loaded
* successfully but subsequent container file processing encounters a
* failure.
*/
- return error;
+ return error ?: matched_cnt;
}
static int start_update(void)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
index 18c833f..c921ea9 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
@@ -310,7 +310,6 @@ static enum microcode_match_result compare_patch(
*/
static int get_matching_microcode(const void *mc, unsigned int cpu)
{
- const struct cpu_signature *sig = &per_cpu(cpu_sig, cpu);
const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header = mc;
unsigned long total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
void *new_mc = xmalloc_bytes(total_size);
@@ -328,18 +327,9 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(const void *mc, unsigned int cpu)
/*
* In order to support a system with mixed stepping CPUs, save this ucode
- * patch before checking whether it matches with current CPU.
+ * patch without checking whether it matches with current CPU.
*/
- if ( !microcode_save_patch(microcode_patch) )
- return 0;
-
- if ( microcode_update_match(mc, sig->sig, sig->pf, sig->rev) != NEW_UCODE )
- return 0;
-
- pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode update with"
- " version %#x (current=%#x)\n",
- cpu, mc_header->rev, sig->rev);
- return 1;
+ return microcode_save_patch(microcode_patch);
}
static int apply_microcode(void)
@@ -451,10 +441,7 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(const void *buf, size_t size)
if ( offset < 0 )
error = offset;
- if ( !error && matching_count )
- error = apply_microcode();
-
- return error;
+ return error ?: matching_count;
}
static const struct microcode_ops microcode_intel_ops = {
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
index 763b0bd..2a7f30e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
@@ -363,10 +363,7 @@ void start_secondary(void *unused)
initialize_cpu_data(cpu);
- if ( system_state <= SYS_STATE_smp_boot )
- early_microcode_update_cpu(false);
- else
- microcode_resume_cpu();
+ early_microcode_update_cpu();
/*
* If MSR_SPEC_CTRL is available, apply Xen's default setting and discard
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
index 186eb8b..9925916 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
@@ -573,8 +573,7 @@ int guest_wrmsr_xen(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t idx, uint64_t val);
void microcode_set_module(unsigned int);
int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void), unsigned long len);
-int microcode_resume_cpu(void);
-int early_microcode_update_cpu(bool start_update);
+int early_microcode_update_cpu(void);
int early_microcode_init(void);
int microcode_init_intel(void);
int microcode_init_amd(void);
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-11 7:57 [PATCH v6 00/12] improve late microcode loading Chao Gao
2019-03-11 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] misc/xenmicrocode: Upload a microcode blob to the hypervisor Chao Gao
2019-03-12 15:27 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-13 5:05 ` Chao Gao
2019-03-13 9:24 ` Wei Liu
2019-03-25 9:38 ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-04-02 2:26 ` Chao Gao
2019-03-11 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] microcode/intel: use union to get fields without shifting and masking Chao Gao
2019-03-12 15:33 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-12 16:43 ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-12 18:23 ` Wei Liu
2019-03-11 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] microcode/intel: extend microcode_update_match() Chao Gao
2019-03-11 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] microcode: introduce a global cache of ucode patch Chao Gao
2019-03-12 16:53 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-12 23:31 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-03-13 5:28 ` Chao Gao
2019-03-13 7:39 ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-13 10:30 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-13 17:04 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-14 7:42 ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-13 16:36 ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-03-14 1:39 ` Chao Gao
2019-03-11 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] microcode: only save compatible ucode patches Chao Gao
2019-03-12 17:03 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-03-13 7:45 ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-11 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] microcode: remove struct ucode_cpu_info Chao Gao
2019-03-11 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] microcode: remove pointless 'cpu' parameter Chao Gao
2019-03-11 7:57 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2019-03-11 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] microcode: remove struct microcode_info Chao Gao
2019-03-11 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode Chao Gao
2019-03-21 11:08 ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-03-11 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading Chao Gao
2019-03-13 0:07 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-03-13 5:02 ` Chao Gao
2019-03-13 7:54 ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-13 8:02 ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-14 12:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-14 18:57 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-03-14 20:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-15 9:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-15 10:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-14 13:01 ` Chao Gao
2019-03-14 13:08 ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-11 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] microcode: update microcode on cores in parallel Chao Gao
2019-03-21 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH v6 13/12] microcode: add sequential application policy Sergey Dyasli
2019-03-21 14:25 ` Chao Gao
2019-03-26 16:23 ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-19 20:22 ` [PATCH v6 00/12] improve late microcode loading Woods, Brian
2019-03-19 21:39 ` Woods, Brian
2019-03-20 8:58 ` Chao Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1552291056-20286-9-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).