From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oprofile: Add X7542 and E7-8837 to the list
	of supported cpus
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:13:17 +0100
Message-ID: <1568155.vSrY4pmdPT@amur>
References: <1449364.BXBucXMpuY@amur>
	<50B4C87402000078000ABA9F@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <50B4C87402000078000ABA9F@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Am Dienstag 27 November 2012, 13:04:36 schrieb Jan Beulich:
> >>> On 26.11.12 at 13:52, Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Add intel cpus X7542 and E7-8837 to the list of supported cpus.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > Dietmar.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com>
> > 
> > diff -r 0049de3827bc -r 6fb0129600cd xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c   Fri Nov 23 11:06:15 2012 +0000
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c   Mon Nov 26 13:36:00 2012 +0100
> > @@ -366,6 +366,8 @@ static int __init ppro_init(char ** cpu_
> >                 ppro_has_global_ctrl = 1;
> >                 break;
> >         case 26:
> > +       case 46:
> > +       case 47:
> >                 arch_perfmon_setup_counters();
> >                 *cpu_type = "i386/core_i7";
> >                 ppro_has_global_ctrl = 1;
> 
> Actually, and apart from the patch being white space damaged,
> after a closer look I think this is wrong - these newer CPUs
> shouldn't get be handled here, but instead should be covered by
> arch_perfmon_init(). Are you observing X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON
> not getting set on these CPUs by init_intel()?

Yes you are right. I wasn't aware of this!
Dietmar.

> 
> Jan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 
-- 
Company details: http://ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html