xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Martin <furryfuttock@gmail.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Strange interdependace between domains
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:56:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1646915994.20140213165604@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi all,

Sorry, I just sent this without a subject. Here it is with the subject
as it should be.

I  am  now successfully running my little operating system inside Xen.
It  is  fully  preemptive and working a treat, but I have just noticed
something  I  wasn't expecting, and will really be a problem for me if
I can't work around it.

My configuration is as follows:

1.- Hardware: Intel i3, 4GB RAM, 64GB SSD.

2.- Xen: 4.4 (just pulled from repository)

3.- Dom0: Debian Wheezy (Kernel 3.2)

4.- 2 cpu pools:

# xl cpupool-list
Name               CPUs   Sched     Active   Domain count
Pool-0               3    credit       y          2
pv499                1  arinc653       y          1

5.- 2 domU:

# xl list
Name                                        ID   Mem VCPUs      State   Time(s)
Domain-0                                     0   984     3     r-----      39.7
win7x64                                      1  2046     3     -b----     143.0
pv499                                        3   128     1     -b----      61.2

6.- All VCPUs are pinned:

# xl vcpu-list
Name                                ID  VCPU   CPU State   Time(s) CPU Affinity
Domain-0                             0     0    0   -b-      27.5  0
Domain-0                             0     1    1   -b-       7.2  1
Domain-0                             0     2    2   r--       5.1  2
win7x64                              1     0    0   -b-      71.6  0
win7x64                              1     1    1   -b-      37.7  1
win7x64                              1     2    2   -b-      34.5  2
pv499                                3     0    3   -b-      62.1  3

7.- pv499 is the domU that I am testing. It has no disk or vif devices
(yet). I am running a little test program in pv499 and the timing I
see is varies depending on disk activity.

My test program runs prints up the time taken in milliseconds for a
million cycles. With no disk activity I see 940 ms, with disk activity
I see 1200 ms.

I can't understand this as disk activity should be running on cores 0,
1  and 2, but never on core 3. The only thing running on core 3 should
by my paravirtual machine and the hypervisor stub.

Any idea what's going on?


-- 
Best regards,
 Simon                          mailto:furryfuttock@gmail.com

             reply	other threads:[~2014-02-13 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-13 16:56 Simon Martin [this message]
2014-02-13 17:07 ` Strange interdependace between domains Ian Campbell
2014-02-13 17:28   ` Simon Martin
2014-02-13 17:39     ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-13 17:36 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-13 20:47   ` Nate Studer
2014-02-13 22:25   ` Simon Martin
2014-02-13 23:13     ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-14 10:26       ` Don Slutz
2014-02-14 12:02     ` Simon Martin
2014-02-14 13:26       ` Andrew Cooper
2014-02-14 17:21       ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-17 12:46         ` Simon Martin
2014-02-18 16:55           ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-18 17:58             ` Don Slutz
2014-02-18 18:06               ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-20  6:07                 ` Juergen Gross
2014-02-20 18:22                   ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-21  6:31                     ` Juergen Gross
2014-02-21 17:24                       ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-24  9:25                         ` Juergen Gross
2014-02-17 13:19         ` Juergen Gross
2014-02-17 15:08           ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-18  5:31             ` Juergen Gross
2014-02-17 14:13         ` Nate Studer
2014-02-18 16:47           ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1646915994.20140213165604@gmail.com \
    --to=furryfuttock@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).