From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Diana Crisan Subject: Re: Early ACPI events prevent subsequent ACPI functionality on xen 4.3 + HVM domU Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 11:45:20 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <1809930721.71216.1369219520131.JavaMail.root@flexiant.com> References: <752956577.8634488.1368537190555.JavaMail.root@zimbra002> <86B77960F7BEC777A3C5C339@Ximines.local> <519B947D.8030607@eu.citrix.com> <519B9801.3080901@eu.citrix.com> <20130521164531.GE3669@phenom.dumpdata.com> <6D7B8289F0F8A65C8C2A25C7@Ximines.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Alex Bligh Cc: Ian Campbell , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , George Dunlap , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Paul Durrant , Stefano Stabellini , Anthony Perard , Dave Scott List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >--On 22 May 2013 10:21:44 +0100 George Dunlap >wrote: >>> The second problem is that ACPI shutdown appears not to work reliably >>> either (whenever issued). >> >> I'll have another look today, but it seemed fairly reliable to me. >> Just to double-check -- you are issuing the ACPI commands after the VM >> has come all the way up, right? Or are you issuing them early during >> boot, like you were for the xl shutdown commands? > >I believe Diana has tried both. Diana? I have tested both cases with Ubuntu. Sending the trigger is reliable if you wait for boot to fully complete. However, if I issue it during boot it does not get executed. Any subsequent triggers do not get executed as well until one is sent when the vm has fully booted. > >> The other thing is that I'm using Wheezy, not Ubuntu, which may cause >> a difference. > >Possibly. I guess Diana could try that too :-) >-- >Alex Bligh -- Diana Crisan