From: Gordan Bobic <gordan@bobich.net>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Xen-devel List <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Nvidia GPU passthrough and Device IDs
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:29:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c514247578d36d799ddccf57584d50e@mail.shatteredsilicon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5297288D.4070301@citrix.com>
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:27:09 +0000, Andrew Cooper
<andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 28/11/13 11:21, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> This has recently come to my attention:
>>
>> http://www.nvidia.com/object/user-selectable-machines.html
>>
>> along with this snippet of information:
>>
>> - Physical Function PCIid: 10ed:11bf - GK104GL [GRID K2]
>> - Virtual Function selectable from
>> PCIid: 10ed:118b - GK104 [GeForce K2 USM]
>> PCIid: 10ed:118c - GK104 [NVS K2 USM]
>> PCIid: 10ed: 11b0 - GK104GL [Quadro K2 USM]
>> PCIid: 10ed:11b1 - GK104GL [Tesla K2 USM]
>>
>> The way this reads to me is that it means that a different
>> device ID is exposed to domU than what runs on the host.
>>
>> Therefore, it must be possible to change the device ID
>> visible to domU to something other than what is visible
>> on the host.
>>
>> So, as per a question that has recently been asked, is
>> there a way to apply a software shim to expose a different
>> device ID to the domU when doing PCI passthrough? This
>> might completely avoid the need to modify the GeForce
>> cards in ways discussed here recently to make them
>> work in PCI passthrough mode by simply faking the
>> device ID exposed.
>>
>> Gordan
>
> All config space accesses get vetted by Qemu or pcifront.
>
> We have had one bug for a particular graphics card with PCI
> passthrough
> which was fixed by faking up the wrong class code. (There was a
> windows
> XPDM/WDDM stack issue with the affected card, and the cirrus emulated
> graphics card was detected as "better" than the passed-through one)
I'll take that to be a resounding "yes" in answer to my
question. :)
Could you please point me in the rough direction of the code
and process flow that handles this?
Gordan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-28 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-28 11:21 Nvidia GPU passthrough and Device IDs Gordan Bobic
2013-11-28 11:27 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-11-28 11:29 ` Gordan Bobic [this message]
2013-12-02 21:06 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c514247578d36d799ddccf57584d50e@mail.shatteredsilicon.net \
--to=gordan@bobich.net \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).