From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>,
Vijay Kilari <vijay.kilari@gmail.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/28] ARM: vGIC: advertise LPI support
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 14:03:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f7ee937-96c2-55eb-3f1c-af24d03b66ac@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170511175340.8448-13-andre.przywara@arm.com>
Hi Andre,
On 11/05/17 18:53, Andre Przywara wrote:
> To let a guest know about the availability of virtual LPIs, set the
> respective bits in the virtual GIC registers and let a guest control
> the LPI enable bit.
> Only report the LPI capability if the host has initialized at least
> one ITS.
> This removes a "TBD" comment, as we now populate the processor number
> in the GICR_TYPE register.
s/GICR_TYPE/GICR_TYPER/
Also, I think it would be worth explaining that you populate
GICR_TYPER.Process_Number because the ITS will use it later on.
> Advertise 24 bits worth of LPIs to the guest.
Again this is not valid anymore. You said you would drop it on the
previous version. So why it has not been done?
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> index 38c123c..6dbdb2e 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -170,8 +170,19 @@ static int __vgic_v3_rdistr_rd_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
> switch ( gicr_reg )
> {
> case VREG32(GICR_CTLR):
> - /* We have not implemented LPI's, read zero */
> - goto read_as_zero_32;
> + {
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + if ( !v->domain->arch.vgic.has_its )
> + goto read_as_zero_32;
> + if ( dabt.size != DABT_WORD ) goto bad_width;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
> + *r = vgic_reg32_extract(!!(v->arch.vgic.flags & VGIC_V3_LPIS_ENABLED),
> + info);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
> + return 1;
> + }
>
> case VREG32(GICR_IIDR):
> if ( dabt.size != DABT_WORD ) goto bad_width;
> @@ -183,16 +194,20 @@ static int __vgic_v3_rdistr_rd_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
> uint64_t typer, aff;
>
> if ( !vgic_reg64_check_access(dabt) ) goto bad_width;
> - /* TBD: Update processor id in [23:8] when ITS support is added */
> aff = (MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(v->arch.vmpidr, 3) << 56 |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(v->arch.vmpidr, 2) << 48 |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(v->arch.vmpidr, 1) << 40 |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(v->arch.vmpidr, 0) << 32);
> typer = aff;
> + /* We use the VCPU ID as the redistributor ID in bits[23:8] */
> + typer |= (v->vcpu_id & 0xffff) << 8;
Why the mask here? This sound like a bug to me if vcpu_id does not fit
it and you would make it worst by the mask.
But this is already addressed by max_vcpus in the vgic_ops. So please
drop the pointless mask.
Lastly, I would have expected to try to address my remark everywhere
regarding hardcoding offset. In this case,
>
> if ( v->arch.vgic.flags & VGIC_V3_RDIST_LAST )
> typer |= GICR_TYPER_LAST;
>
> + if ( v->domain->arch.vgic.has_its )
> + typer |= GICR_TYPER_PLPIS;
> +
> *r = vgic_reg64_extract(typer, info);
>
> return 1;
> @@ -426,6 +441,28 @@ static uint64_t sanitize_pendbaser(uint64_t reg)
> return reg;
> }
>
> +static void vgic_vcpu_enable_lpis(struct vcpu *v)
> +{
> + uint64_t reg = v->domain->arch.vgic.rdist_propbase;
> + unsigned int nr_lpis = BIT((reg & 0x1f) + 1);
> +
> + /* rdists_enabled is protected by the domain lock. */
> + ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&v->domain->arch.vgic.lock));
> +
> + if ( nr_lpis < LPI_OFFSET )
> + nr_lpis = 0;
> + else
> + nr_lpis -= LPI_OFFSET;
> +
> + if ( !v->domain->arch.vgic.rdists_enabled )
> + {
> + v->domain->arch.vgic.nr_lpis = nr_lpis;
> + v->domain->arch.vgic.rdists_enabled = true;
> + }
> +
> + v->arch.vgic.flags |= VGIC_V3_LPIS_ENABLED;
> +}
> +
> static int __vgic_v3_rdistr_rd_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
> uint32_t gicr_reg,
> register_t r)
> @@ -436,8 +473,26 @@ static int __vgic_v3_rdistr_rd_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
> switch ( gicr_reg )
> {
> case VREG32(GICR_CTLR):
> - /* LPI's not implemented */
> - goto write_ignore_32;
> + {
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + if ( !v->domain->arch.vgic.has_its )
> + goto write_ignore_32;
> + if ( dabt.size != DABT_WORD ) goto bad_width;
> +
> + vgic_lock(v); /* protects rdists_enabled */
Getting back to the locking. I don't see any place where we get the
domain vgic lock before vCPU vgic lock. So this raises the question why
this ordering and not moving this lock into vgic_vcpu_enable_lpis.
At least this require documentation in the code and explanation in the
commit message.
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
> +
> + /* LPIs can only be enabled once, but never disabled again. */
> + if ( (r & GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS) &&
> + !(v->arch.vgic.flags & VGIC_V3_LPIS_ENABLED) )
> + vgic_vcpu_enable_lpis(v);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
> + vgic_unlock(v);
> +
> + return 1;
> + }
>
> case VREG32(GICR_IIDR):
> /* RO */
> @@ -1058,6 +1113,11 @@ static int vgic_v3_distr_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
> typer = ((ncpus - 1) << GICD_TYPE_CPUS_SHIFT |
> DIV_ROUND_UP(v->domain->arch.vgic.nr_spis, 32));
>
> + if ( v->domain->arch.vgic.has_its )
> + {
> + typer |= GICD_TYPE_LPIS;
> + irq_bits = v->domain->arch.vgic.intid_bits;
> + }
As I said on the previous version, I would have expected the field
intid_bits to be used even if ITS is not enabled.
The current code make very difficult to understand the purpose of
intid_bits and know it is only used when ITS is enabled.
intid_bits should correctly be initialized in vgic_v3_domain_init and
directly used it.
> typer |= (irq_bits - 1) << GICD_TYPE_ID_BITS_SHIFT;
>
> *r = vgic_reg32_extract(typer, info);
>
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-16 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 17:53 [PATCH v9 00/28] arm64: Dom0 ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 01/28] ARM: GICv3: setup number of LPI bits for a GICv3 guest Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 18:34 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 02/28] ARM: VGIC: move irq_to_pending() calls under the VGIC VCPU lock Andre Przywara
2017-05-20 0:34 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 03/28] ARM: GIC: Add checks for NULL pointer pending_irq's Andre Przywara
2017-05-12 14:19 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-22 16:49 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-22 17:15 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-25 16:14 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-20 1:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 04/28] ARM: GICv3: introduce separate pending_irq structs for LPIs Andre Przywara
2017-05-12 14:22 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-22 21:52 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 05/28] ARM: GICv3: forward pending LPIs to guests Andre Przywara
2017-05-12 14:55 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-22 22:03 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-25 16:42 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 06/28] ARM: GICv3: enable ITS and LPIs on the host Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 07/28] ARM: vGICv3: handle virtual LPI pending and property tables Andre Przywara
2017-05-12 15:23 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 08/28] ARM: introduce vgic_access_guest_memory() Andre Przywara
2017-05-12 15:30 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 09/28] ARM: vGICv3: re-use vgic_reg64_check_access Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 10/28] ARM: GIC: export and extend vgic_init_pending_irq() Andre Przywara
2017-05-16 12:26 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 11/28] ARM: VGIC: add vcpu_id to struct pending_irq Andre Przywara
2017-05-16 12:31 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-22 22:15 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-23 9:49 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 12/28] ARM: vGIC: advertise LPI support Andre Przywara
2017-05-16 13:03 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2017-05-22 22:19 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-23 10:49 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-23 17:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-24 10:10 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-25 18:02 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-25 18:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-25 20:07 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-25 21:05 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-26 10:19 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-26 17:12 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-23 17:23 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 13/28] ARM: vITS: add command handling stub and MMIO emulation Andre Przywara
2017-05-16 15:24 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-17 16:16 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-22 22:32 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-23 10:54 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-23 17:43 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 14/28] ARM: vITS: introduce translation table walks Andre Przywara
2017-05-16 15:57 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 15/28] ARM: vITS: provide access to struct pending_irq Andre Przywara
2017-05-17 15:35 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-22 16:50 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-22 17:19 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-26 9:10 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-26 10:00 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 16/28] ARM: vITS: handle INT command Andre Przywara
2017-05-17 16:17 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-23 17:24 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 17/28] ARM: vITS: handle MAPC command Andre Przywara
2017-05-17 17:22 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 18/28] ARM: vITS: handle CLEAR command Andre Przywara
2017-05-17 17:45 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-23 17:24 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-24 9:04 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 19/28] ARM: vITS: handle MAPD command Andre Przywara
2017-05-17 18:07 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-24 9:10 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-24 9:56 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-24 13:09 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-25 18:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-25 20:17 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-25 20:44 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-26 8:16 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 20/28] ARM: GICv3: handle unmapped LPIs Andre Przywara
2017-05-17 18:37 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-20 1:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-22 23:48 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-23 11:10 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-23 18:23 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-24 9:47 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-24 17:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-23 14:41 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 21/28] ARM: vITS: handle MAPTI command Andre Przywara
2017-05-18 14:04 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-22 23:39 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-23 10:01 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-23 17:44 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 22/28] ARM: vITS: handle MOVI command Andre Przywara
2017-05-18 14:17 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-23 0:28 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 23/28] ARM: vITS: handle DISCARD command Andre Przywara
2017-05-18 14:23 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-22 16:50 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-22 17:20 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-23 9:40 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 24/28] ARM: vITS: handle INV command Andre Przywara
2017-05-23 0:01 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 25/28] ARM: vITS: handle INVALL command Andre Przywara
2017-06-02 17:24 ` Julien Grall
2017-06-02 17:25 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 26/28] ARM: vITS: increase mmio_count for each ITS Andre Przywara
2017-05-18 14:34 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 27/28] ARM: vITS: create and initialize virtual ITSes for Dom0 Andre Przywara
2017-05-18 14:41 ` Julien Grall
2017-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH v9 28/28] ARM: vITS: create ITS subnodes for Dom0 DT Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 18:31 ` [PATCH v9 00/28] arm64: Dom0 ITS emulation Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f7ee937-96c2-55eb-3f1c-af24d03b66ac@arm.com \
--to=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=shankerd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=vijay.kilari@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).