From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastian Blank Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq helper Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:12:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20091012211258.GA21213@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> References: <4AC92A65.40806@goop.org> <20091005013517.GA6081@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <4ACA2AFD.4080305@goop.org> <20091005224310.GA32144@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <4ACA90F2.1060909@goop.org> <20091006033050.GA6332@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <4ACB93F8.5010900@goop.org> <20091007163521.GA17998@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <4ACD3346.3010307@goop.org> <20091012205208.GE17163@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091012205208.GE17163@elte.hu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Xen-devel , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , Stable Kernel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:52:08PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > ping - any update about this fix? Since it fixes a real crash it would > be nice to fix this for .32. It works nicely. But IMHO this whole infrastructure should go for now, at least until gcc is able to produce functions with this call convention on its own. Or it needs to be restricted to only assembler functions. The other users of this may only work because the stack protector is already disabled for arch/x86/xen/mmu.o. Bastian -- Men will always be men -- no matter where they are. -- Harry Mudd, "Mudd's Women", stardate 1329.8