From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Michael D Labriola <mlabriol@gdeb.com>
Cc: Chris <tknchris@gmail.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com"
<xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: pv_ops reassigndev for pci passthrough
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:46:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100129224659.GA20092@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF7926313B.B07CFE8D-ON8525769A.005399D0-8525769A.00546A55@gdeb.com>
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:22:02AM -0500, Michael D Labriola wrote:
> > As a hack you can eliminate the check in the Xend python code for this
> > and see how far you can go. Just remember that it is a hack :-)
>
> Might try this if I get a spare moment... just to see what happens ;-)
>
> > I had not ported it over. My thought was to write code in the pciback
> code
> > that would do this automatically (if BARs are found to be not BAR
> aligned).
> >
> > Thought I am unsure of why this was not explored - are there any
> badtechnical
> > reasons to make BARs page-aligned after the device has been enabled (and
> then
> > disabled)?
> >
> > I am taking aside the Linux kernel resources structs (request_resource
> > and its friends), which probabally will throw a fit.
>
> Yeah, I always kinda wondered why this wasn't done automatically by
> pciback. Having pciback do it would mean that even non-BAR aligned
> devices could be exported after booting and w/out specifying PCI IDs as
> kernel args. That would be one fewer issue to fix later in the
> upstreaming effort.
So this is actually implemented in the pvops kernel, but has a different
name: pci=resource_alignment=<BDF>
This is what you need to pass as bootup argument, for example:
xen-pciback.hide=(07:00.0)(08:05.0)(08:07.0)(08:07.2) pci=resource_alignment=08:05.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-29 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-23 17:42 pv_ops reassigndev for pci passthrough Michael D Labriola
2009-12-23 18:28 ` Chris
2009-12-23 19:03 ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2009-12-23 20:10 ` Michael D Labriola
2009-12-23 21:37 ` Keir Fraser
2009-12-28 14:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2009-12-28 15:22 ` Michael D Labriola
2010-01-29 22:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100129224659.GA20092@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=mlabriol@gdeb.com \
--cc=tknchris@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).