xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: current not very current (vs curr_vcpu)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:23:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100219112349.2cd1854a@mantra.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C7A3F862.A995%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:12:18 +0000
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

> On 19/02/2010 04:21, "Mukesh Rathor" <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> > I noticed while debugging something that current is not pointing to
> > the current vcpu upon serial interrupt. The regs->SP clearly shows
> > 64bit dom0 stack, guest_mode(regs) returns 1, but current is
> > pointing to idle vcpu. I'm not able to figure how this is possible.
> > I can come up with scenario where dom0.vcpu yields cpu to idle vcpu
> > in which case curr_vcpu will point to dom0.vcpu and current to idle
> > vcpu. But in that case guest_mode(regs) will be false, and regs.SP
> > will show hyp stack. Correct?
> > 
> > Am I correct that if guest_mode() then current should always point
> > to guest vcpu? If yes, then I will debug this further.
> 
> The behaviour you see is expected. Guest_mode() is meaningless when
> running an idle vcpu. This is because the guest regs at the bottom of
> the stack are junk for an idle vcpu (and also we do lazy state
> synchronisation, so they may be the valid active regs for the last
> scheduled non-idle vcpu).
> 
>  -- Keir
> 

Yes, but my point is it doesn't appear to be running idle vcpu as
indicated by regs->rsp and regs->rip. They both point to dom0 context.
This from printk in ns16550_interrupt().

To rephrase the question, if regs->rip and regs->rsp show guest context
in do_IRQ(), then current must always point to guest vcpu, correct?

thanks,
Mukesh

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-19 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-19  4:21 current not very current (vs curr_vcpu) Mukesh Rathor
2010-02-19  8:12 ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-19 19:23   ` Mukesh Rathor [this message]
2010-02-19 21:34     ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-20  3:50       ` Mukesh Rathor
2010-02-20  7:45         ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-22 18:59           ` Mukesh Rathor
2010-02-23 19:46           ` Mukesh Rathor
2010-02-23 21:03             ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-24  3:55               ` Mukesh Rathor
2010-02-24 10:45                 ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-25  1:06                   ` Mukesh Rathor
2010-02-25  8:07                     ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100219112349.2cd1854a@mantra.us.oracle.com \
    --to=mukesh.rathor@oracle.com \
    --cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).