From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:05:39 -0500 Message-ID: <20100225160539.GA12709@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <27714378.post@talk.nabble.com> <20100225115539.GM2761@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100225115539.GM2761@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Fantu , M A Young List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:55:39PM +0200, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:56:14AM +0000, M A Young wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Fantu wrote: > > > >> I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is good? = for test > >> it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in > >> buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right? > >> I also see update in this page, for use config example for xen/stabl= e i must > >> use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"? > >> Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=3Dy in page but there isn't in= example > >> config? That is my fault. I was hoping to have the PCI frontend branch ready by the time Pasi would have added that in (and ask Jeremy to merge it in), but I am still trying to narrow down the list of patches.