From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
To: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v4] PV extension of HVM(hybrid) support in Xen
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:40:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003011940.50685.sheng@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100301102127.GA17243@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
On Monday 01 March 2010 18:21:27 Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 09:43 +0000 on 01 Mar (1267436621), Sheng Yang wrote:
> > @@ -3109,6 +3117,36 @@
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > + case HVMOP_enable_pv: {
>
> Why does this have to be explicitly enabled? Can't you just notice that
> a domain is using the evtchnop hypercalls?
The issue is pv timer. It assumed the tsc start from 0, which is different
from HVM. So I'd like to give it a explicit call here. Otherwise it can be
hooked in evtchn binding, but I don't think that's clear...
> > + struct xen_hvm_pv_type a;
> > + struct domain *d;
> > +
> > + if ( copy_from_guest(&a, arg, 1) )
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + rc = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(a.domid, &d);
>
> Domains do this to each other? It looks like it has surprising
> side-effects.
Should not allowed... I think a.domid should always be the current domain.
Replace it with DOMID_SELF?
> > + if ( rc != 0 )
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + rc = -EINVAL;
> > + if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) )
> > + goto param_fail5;
> > +
> > + rc = xsm_hvm_param(d, op);
> > + if ( rc )
> > + goto param_fail5;
> > +
> > + if (a.flags & HVM_PV_EVTCHN) {
> > + update_domain_wallclock_time(d);
> > + hvm_funcs.set_tsc_offset(d->vcpu[0], 0);
>
> Only vcpu 0? Doesn't this do horrible things to timekeeping in the guest?
The other vcpus are initialized when it is brought up. TSC started from 0 is a
fundamental assumption for pv clock in Linux...
>
> > + d->hvm_pv_enabled |= XEN_HVM_PV_EVTCHN_ENABLED;
> > + printk("HVM: PV featured evtchn enabled\n");
>
> Please remove your debugging printks.
OK...
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
>
> > + }
> > +param_fail5:
> > + rcu_unlock_domain(d);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > default:
> > {
> > gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "Bad HVM op %ld.\n", op);
>
> Tim.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-01 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-01 9:43 [PATCH][v4] PV extension of HVM(hybrid) support in Xen Sheng Yang
2010-03-01 10:00 ` Keir Fraser
2010-03-01 10:52 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-01 10:21 ` Tim Deegan
2010-03-01 11:40 ` Sheng Yang [this message]
2010-03-02 1:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-02 3:36 ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-02 4:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-02 5:04 ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-02 5:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003011940.50685.sheng@linux.intel.com \
--to=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Tim.Deegan@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).