From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/7][v4] PV extension of HVM (Hybrid) for Xen
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:34:56 +0800
Message-ID: <201003020934.56614.sheng@linux.intel.com>
References: <1267436315-24486-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <201003020926.03512.sheng@linux.intel.com> <4B8C6AA4.8000700@goop.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B8C6AA4.8000700@goop.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tuesday 02 March 2010 09:32:20 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 03/01/2010 05:26 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> >> Why 2.6.33?  I'm currently working on 2.6.32; I intend to move to .33
> >> shortly, but .32 is a much more convenient base (particularly if you're
> >> interested in getting these changes into any distro kernels).
> >>
> >> I rebased it to .32 without much effort.
> >
> > OK.
> 
> Hm, looks like the x86_platform_ipi stuff is missing in .32.
> 
I thought that one should still called smp_generic_interrupt in .32?

-- 
regards
Yang, Sheng