From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= <pasik@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: Re: xen/stable 2.6.32.9 32bit dom0 kernel crashes
	early on boot
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:28:37 +0200
Message-ID: <20100304202837.GH2761@reaktio.net>
References: <20100304195337.GF2761@reaktio.net> <4B90157D.5090900@goop.org>
	<20100304202316.GG2761@reaktio.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100304202316.GG2761@reaktio.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:18:05PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > On 03/04/2010 11:53 AM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote:
> >> 32bit PAE 2.6.32.9 xen/stable dom0 kernel crashes early on my (old) =
testbox..
> >>
> >> http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-xen-stabl=
e-2.6.32.9-32b-crash-log01.txt
> >>
> >> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1])
> >> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] high edge lint[0x1])
> >> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x02] high edge lint[0x1])
> >> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x03] high edge lint[0x1])
> >> ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x04] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
> >> (XEN) mm.c:1746:d0 Bad L1 flags 80000100
> >> (XEN) mm.c:778:d0 Bad L1 flags 80000100
> >>   =20
> >
> > Does the machine support NX?  I'm guessing no.
> >
>=20
> on baremetal:
>=20
> # dmesg | grep NX
> Using x86 segment limits to approximate NX protection
>=20
> # grep flags /proc/cpuinfo
> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca =
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe constant_t=
sc up pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl cid xtpr
>=20

It was 2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.i686.PAE saying the above..
2.6.32.9 xen/stable booted on baremetal doesn't say anything about NX.

-- Pasi