From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Subject: Re: pvops-2.6.32 - Interrupt routing problem
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:41:01 +0100
Message-ID: <20100314164101.GA8386@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
References: <20100310111923.GA7087@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
	<20100314140813.GA5309@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
	<20100314152334.GA6483@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
	<4B9D0726.3060304@goop.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B9D0726.3060304@goop.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 08:56:22AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>                                                It's interesting your  
> devices both have GSIs in the "legacy ISA" range (< 16); I wonder if  
> something somewhere is misdescribing the interrupts.

I found another occurance of this problem. See
<87zl6klp06.fsf@frosties.localdomain>. The OP provided me with the input
that the devices in question where all using interrupt 10.

Bastian

-- 
Well, Jim, I'm not much of an actor either.