From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xen: Control-flow cleanup
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:51:44 +0100
Message-ID: <20100324225144.GA30197@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
References: <20100324115137.GA10770@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
	<4BAA5189.8080503@goop.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4BAA5189.8080503@goop.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:53:13AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Thanks, I agree, but I tweaked it to use "goto out" to preserve the  
> single return, and fixed some lines which can now be unwrapped with the  
> shallower indent.

What is the reason for this single return except that it makes the code
less readable?

Bastian

-- 
Totally illogical, there was no chance.
		-- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3