From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: status of PV drivers in Xen 4.0 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:04:59 +0300 Message-ID: <20100330100459.GC1878@reaktio.net> References: <4BB11551.5010707@inria.fr> <20100330060411.GT1878@reaktio.net> <4BB1B37D.3030100@inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BB1B37D.3030100@inria.fr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Guillaume Rousse Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:17:01AM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Le 30/03/2010 08:04, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen a =E9crit : > >> Is there any plan to update it to a more recent kernel, as xen 4.0 h= as > >> switched to a newer pvops tree ? > >> > >=20 > > There's ongoing work to get the PV-on-HVM drivers accepted to upstrea= m kernel.org > > Linux kernel. > I saw the patches announced there. Also, I saw the announcement in > 2.6.33 changelog, but I don't see the exact relationship with the > 4 drivers present in xen archive: > http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_33#head-be694b031a673ddf43328f04a1cc= 5c781467bd17 I think that "Support for Xen PV-on-HVM guests" is related to KVM, not to= Xen. -- Pasi