From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Automatic loading of xen-evtchn module in Xen 4.0.0?
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:39:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100331133923.GB28074@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270024840.10129.72471.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:40:40AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 23:47 +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >
> > In practice there's no need to get very modular. There's some value
> > in
> > not loading all that backend support code unless we're actually dom0,
> > but I don't think there's much value in getting too fine-grained
> > beyond that. The actual drivers themselves are fairly ordinary, so
> > they will probably just work if we can make xenbus generate the right
> > request events. Hm, I guess that would be the tool stack setting
> > things up for a new domain, and requesting backend devices in the
> > process, no?
>
> What happens with frontend hotplug, and should happen with backends too,
> is that the xenbus core watches the "device" (or "backend") node in
> xenstore (relative to the domain's root path "/local/domain/<X>/"). The
> tools then create the necessary nodes to create the device which
> triggers the xenstore watch, e.g. on a path starting with "vif", which
> causes xenbus to generate a uevent with the necessary MODALIAS, see
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c:xenbus_uevent().
>
> The only problem with this is getting the initial xenbus-backend.ko
> loaded so that it can do the watch -- perhaps that falls in the same
> boat as evtchn and gntdev etc.
.. which goes back to what I suggested some time ago, that might do the
trick. That is to make the owner of /sys/hypervisor do a kobject_uevent
and have an udev rule that would listen to this and load the
xenbus-backend.ko. That should start the avalanche of Xen backend module
loading, I think?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-31 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-27 17:32 Automatic loading of xen-evtchn module in Xen 4.0.0? Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-03-27 22:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-30 9:44 ` Ian Campbell
2010-03-30 14:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-30 14:26 ` Ian Campbell
2010-03-30 22:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-31 8:40 ` Ian Campbell
2010-03-31 13:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100331133923.GB28074@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).