From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mukesh Rathor Subject: Re: max vcpus in dom0 Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:34:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20100427193422.36ac956e@mantra.us.oracle.com> References: <4BD6AD07020000780005CF3B@vpn.id2.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BD6AD07020000780005CF3B@vpn.id2.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jan Beulich Cc: Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:23:19 +0100 "Jan Beulich" wrote: > >>> Mukesh Rathor 04/27/10 4:20 AM >>> > >Looking at a bug where dom0 is crashing coming up with more than 32 > >vcpus, the problem happens trying to initialize 32nd vcpu. I see > >the shared info is limited to 32vcpus, implying we'd have a hard > >limit of 32 vcpus in dom0, correct? > > That's the legacy limit, yes. Any attempt to go beyond 32 CPUs > requires the kernel to use the per-vCPU-info-placement hypercall > prior to bringing up those vCPU-s. > > Jan Hi Jan, Yes, I found your patch searching xen-devel implementing VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info after I posted my msg. However, I don't find any kernel using this other than pv-ops kernel. So I assume this is work in progress. If you already have a patch for 2.6.18-xxx, please let me know, if not, I'll work on it. thanks, Mukesh