From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Yuvraj Agarwal <yuvraj@cs.ucsd.edu>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
'Keir Fraser' <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>,
'John McCullough' <jmccullo@cs.ucsd.edu>
Subject: Re: XEN 4.0 + 2.6.31.13 pvops kernel : system crashes on starting 155th domU
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:56:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100429145603.GB28499@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <006e01cae725$54b95a00$fe2c0e00$@ucsd.edu>
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:51:19PM -0700, Yuvraj Agarwal wrote:
> I tried making the change in
> linux-2.6-pvops.git/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
>
> It was:
> #define NR_VECTORS 256
> I changed it to
> #define NR_VECTORS 1024
>
> I still get the same number of nr_irqs (dmesg | grep -i nr_irq) before and
> after the change.
>
> [ 0.000000] nr_irqs_gsi: 48
> [ 0.500076] NR_IRQS:5120 nr_irqs:944
That looks to be different from the previous bootup:
[ 0.000000] NR_IRQS:4352 nr_irqs:256
?
>
> Also, as earlier it crashes on the same number of domU (154). I didn’t
> mention earlier, this a dual core Nehalem machine -- 2 (sockets) * 4 cores
> per CPU * 2 (hyperthreading)
Lots of logical CPUs, weird that your nr_irqs initially was that much
lower.
Anyhow, you mentioned that you narrowed it down to not being enough IRQs
- how did you find that out? Was there an kernel message when you
started the 155th guest?
Oh, also you say that the /proc/interrupts showed the number descending
from 255 down to 89. With this it should have started at 944 and gone
down to 49? Which roughly means 175 guests?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-29 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-27 7:41 XEN 4.0 + 2.6.31.13 pvops kernel : system crashes on starting 155th domU Yuvraj Agarwal
2010-04-27 9:02 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-27 17:14 ` Yuvraj Agarwal
2010-04-27 17:18 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-27 18:58 ` Yuvraj Agarwal
2010-04-27 19:29 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-27 13:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-04-27 17:18 ` Yuvraj Agarwal
2010-04-27 18:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-27 19:10 ` Yuvraj Agarwal
2010-04-27 19:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-27 19:38 ` Yuvraj Agarwal
2010-04-28 0:43 ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-28 1:02 ` Yuvraj Agarwal
2010-04-28 3:45 ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-28 6:47 ` John McCullough
2010-04-28 3:53 ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-28 14:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-04-28 16:57 ` Ian Campbell
2010-04-28 18:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-28 22:51 ` Yuvraj Agarwal
2010-04-29 14:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2010-04-30 3:12 ` Yuvraj Agarwal
2010-04-28 18:13 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100429145603.GB28499@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=jmccullo@cs.ucsd.edu \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=yuvraj@cs.ucsd.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).