From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "dwight at supercomputer.org" Subject: Re: XCP: Crashes on dual Xeon HP ProLiant systems Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 14:07:15 -0700 Message-ID: <201005011407.15429.dwight@supercomputer.org> References: <201004300932.37495.dwight@supercomputer.org> <1272654938.6417.633.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1272654938.6417.633.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Friday 30 April 2010 12:15:38 pm Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 17:32 +0100, dwight at supercomputer.org wrote: > > A 64-bit DomU works just fine. I know the stock XCP > > kernel is 32-bits. Are there any issues running a 64-bit > > XCP kernel, other than a slight degradation in speed? > > The XCP domain 0 kernel is only tested in 32 bit (PAE) > configurations. I'd expect it to work for 64 bit but wouldn't > necessarily bet on it. > > Ian Thank you, Ian. That was helpful. -dwight-