From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave McCracken Subject: Re: Error building current Linux git tree without configuring Xen Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 14:58:25 -0500 Message-ID: <201005031458.25514.dcm@mccr.org> References: <201004301434.26167.dcm@mccr.org> <20100503182735.GF24574@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100503182735.GF24574@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Xen Developers List List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Monday 03 May 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 02:34:26PM -0500, Dave McCracken wrote: > > > > I tried to build a Linux kernel from current git sources without > > specifying > > Which branch is that? Can you do 'git log' and tell me what is the > latest you see? Hmm... I'm not using any branch, so the mainline of git://git.kernel.org/.../jeremy/xen.git . It looks like real development is happening on other branches. Should I be using one of them for testing and submitting new patches? I see xen/next and xen/core as possible choices. > > any form of Xen. I got these three undefined symbols: > > > > xen_register_gsi > > xen_teardown_msi_dev > > xen_setup_msi_irqs > > > > I defined them as dummy functions in arch/x86/include/asm/xen/pci.h for > > the case where CONFIG_XEN is not set, and got a working kernel. They're > > also > > There was a patch that fixed this floating around. Don't think Jeremy > had a chance to check in it.. Ok. I just wanted to make sure it's a known problem and a fix is in progress. Dave McCracken Oracle Corp.