From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Scott Garron <xen-devel@sce.pridelands.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Checksumming problem in pv_ops dom0 kernel / netback
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 14:51:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100522115127.GF17817@reaktio.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271319639.9654.47.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:20:39AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 23:58 +0100, Scott Garron wrote:
> > S.H. Verbrugge wrote:
> > > Ever since we switched to a pv_ops dom0 kernel (we were using 2.6.26
> > > xenkernel from Debian repo before, with Xen 3.2), we started to have
> > > some problems when attempting to route packets on a domU.
> >
> > I'm having the same problem. All TCP packets that are forwarded
> > through a domU are somehow getting a static checksum (0x9e85) just as
> > they're being put out on the wire. ICMP is dropped by the dom0, as you
> > describe, with the "Attempting to checksum a non UDP/TCP packet" message
> > in dmesg. More detail about my situation is in my post to xen-users, here:
> >
> > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2010-03/msg00846.html
> >
> > It doesn't include a solution, though.
> >
> > > This is a tg3 interface
> >
> > I'm also running the tg3 ethernet driver, which may be of
> > significance.
>
> According to the driver source some tg3 chipsets are known to have
> broken checksumming hardware, in particular 5700 B0 silicon. The
> workaround seems to have been present in the driver forever though so
> that may be a red-herring.
>
Recently there was a fix for a bug in netback.. so you might want to update
to latest pvops dom0 kernel from xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch and see if that
fixes the problem.
-- Pasi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-22 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-17 12:34 Checksumming problem in pv_ops dom0 kernel / netback S.H. Verbrugge
2010-03-17 12:48 ` Stefan Kuhne
2010-03-17 15:48 ` S.H. Verbrugge
2010-03-17 23:25 ` James Harper
2010-03-17 23:37 ` Stefan Kuhne
2010-03-17 23:48 ` S.H. Verbrugge
2010-03-18 0:04 ` James Harper
2010-03-18 0:17 ` S.H. Verbrugge
2010-03-30 22:58 ` Scott Garron
2010-04-14 17:27 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-15 8:20 ` Ian Campbell
2010-05-22 11:51 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100522115127.GF17817@reaktio.net \
--to=pasik@iki.fi \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xen-devel@sce.pridelands.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).