From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastian Blank Subject: Re: Name of event-channel and other devices vs. udev Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 16:31:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20100527143104.GB6040@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> References: <20100526105144.GA28280@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <20100527073512.GA17135@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100527073512.GA17135@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser , Jeremy Fitzhardinge List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:35:12AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:51:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > - Make the kernel name the device "xen/evtchn". > This approach somewhat reliable failed for me[1]. Also nothing else in > the kernel uses it. So I assume this is not really supported. Xen themself is responsible for this behaviour. > [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/583283 Bastian -- I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth. -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.9