From: Josip Rodin <joy@entuzijast.net>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36?
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:32:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100607083201.GA16443@orion.carnet.hr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100607074811.GV17817@reaktio.net>
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 10:48:11AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 05:20:06PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > On 06/04/2010 03:39 PM, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > What about the future? I saw Konrad's applied his swiotlb tree with the
> > > right acks for inclusion into linux-next, so that looks like it's planned
> > > to be ready to go in when the .36 merge window opens, right?
> >
> > Yes, and I'm hoping we can get pcifront and pvhvm lined up for .36; with
> > those in place, its a short jump to full dom0 functionality (which, no
> > promises, might also get into .36 on their tails).
>
> swiotlb seems to be in linux-next now.. Congratulations!
Yes, http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/5/71
Now that looks exceedingly smooth, but if you look at the date on
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/11/223 ... on the bright side, the new swiotlb
branch is both peer-reviewed and user-tested in xen/stable-2.6.32.x AFAICT,
so the end-result should be bulletproof (as much as it can be :).
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-07 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-04 22:39 upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36? Josip Rodin
2010-06-05 0:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-05 12:51 ` Josip Rodin
2010-06-06 0:36 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-06 7:36 ` upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36? PV on HVM Xen Boris Derzhavets
2010-06-07 7:48 ` upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36? Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-06-07 8:32 ` Josip Rodin [this message]
2010-06-07 14:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-07 15:24 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-06-07 16:15 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-07 17:12 ` Josip Rodin
2010-06-07 18:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-07 18:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-08 7:57 ` Failure to start xend with 2.6.32.15 (c2cb3df04eb3ff68d0de102b2acacc9b8616e659) under Xen 4.0 Boris Derzhavets
2010-06-08 17:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-04 19:44 ` upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36? Josip Rodin
2010-08-04 20:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-08-04 21:09 ` Łukasz Oleś
2010-08-04 21:38 ` Josip Rodin
2010-08-05 15:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-08-07 22:50 ` Josip Rodin
2010-08-08 1:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-07 16:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100607083201.GA16443@orion.carnet.hr \
--to=joy@entuzijast.net \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).