From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:20:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20100614212040.GC8600@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1275570645-27189-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <1275570645-27189-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1275570645-27189-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeremy@goop.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, ddutile@redhat.com, sheng@linux.intel.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > +static int __cpuinit xen_hvm_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self, > + unsigned long action, void *hcpu) > +{ > + int cpu = (long)hcpu; > + switch (action) { > + case CPU_UP_PREPARE: > + per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = &HYPERVISOR_shared_info->vcpu_info[cpu]; > + break; Is there no need to do anything if the CPUs are brought down? .. snip.. > +/* the callback vector mechanism is a newer alternative way of receiving > + * event channel notifications from Xen: we can receive vector callbacks > + * on any vcpus and we don't need any PCI or IO APIC support */ I am not an expert in English, but I think you need to revise this comment. > +void xen_callback_vector(void) > +{ > + int rc; > + uint64_t callback_via; > + if (xen_have_vector_callback) { > + callback_via = HVM_CALLBACK_VECTOR(XEN_HVM_EVTCHN_CALLBACK); > + rc = xen_set_callback_via(callback_via); > + if (rc) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "request for callback vector failed\n"); Perhaps mention which type? Say 'Request for Xen HVM callback vector failed.\n' ?