From: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: blktap2 portiblity fixes
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:05:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007261805.06746.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19533.41294.111030.339525@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
On Monday 26 July 2010 16:53:02 Ian Jackson wrote:
> Christoph Egger writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: blktap2 portiblity
fixes"):
> > Can you use the c/s numbers, please?
>
> Changeset numbers are not guaranteed to be meaningful outside a
> particular tree, particularly in the presence of merges.
>
> > It was not necessary to backout c/s 21834 as this wasn't the root cause.
>
> I think by 21834 you mean 24277e3237ca.
No, c/s 21834 has the hash e76befc7fe2d.
> Looking at this patch it's difficult to review and test and there are
> some things I would like to see improved. Can I ask you to try to
> split the patch up into separate pieces ?
>
> At the very least, please separate out the following:
> * Adding new interfaces, ie introucing new functions and putting
> code into those functions and replacing it at the original site
> with a call;
> * Const-correctness
> * Code motion between files, and creation of libxl_linux.c;
> * Provide libxl_netbsd.c and associated Makefile changes to
> disable blktap2 on netbsd
> * #include portability fixes for openpty, pty.h etc.
That's doable but I don't see if a standalone const-correctness
patch makes sense just to make gcc happy with an other patch.
> > diff -r 2b768d52bc7f tools/libxl/libxl_bootloader.c
> > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_bootloader.c Sun Jul 25 22:20:47 2010 +0100
> > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_bootloader.c Mon Jul 26 12:41:02 2010 +0200
> > @@ -15,9 +15,16 @@
> > #include "libxl_osdeps.h"
> >
> > #include <string.h>
> > -#include <pty.h>
> > #include <unistd.h>
> > #include <fcntl.h>
> > +#include <termios.h>
> > +#if defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__OpenBSD__)
> > +#include <util.h>
> > +#elif defined(__linux__)
> > +#include <pty.h>
> > +#elif defined(__sun__)
> > +#include <stropts.h>
> > +#endif
>
> This should be done by moving the relevant #includes to osdep.h, where
> all this kind of thing should be done.
Should this header be re-used by tools/console/daemon/io.c ?
If yes, where is the best place to put osdep.h ?
>
> > -int device_physdisk_major_minor(char *physpath, int *major, int *minor)
> > +int device_physdisk_major_minor(const char *physpath, int *major, int
> > *minor)
>
> This change should be separated out.
hg record is your friend.
Christoph
--
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-26 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-20 16:31 [PATCH] libxl: blktap2 portiblity fixes Christoph Egger
2010-07-20 16:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-07-21 8:32 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-23 12:30 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-07-23 18:05 ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-26 10:56 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-26 14:53 ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-26 15:00 ` Ian Campbell
2010-07-26 15:12 ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-26 16:01 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-26 16:05 ` Christoph Egger [this message]
2010-07-26 16:36 ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-27 12:07 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] libxl: " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:18 ` [PATCH 4/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:20 ` [PATCH 5/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 17:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] " Ian Jackson
2010-07-28 9:17 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 16:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] " Ian Jackson
2010-07-28 11:50 ` Christoph Egger
[not found] ` <19535.3166.214153.676101@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
2010-07-28 11:42 ` [PATCH] libxl: compile fix Christoph Egger
2010-07-28 12:22 ` Ian Campbell
2010-07-28 13:03 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/6] libxl: portiblity fixes Ian Jackson
2010-07-28 9:06 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-28 9:21 ` Keir Fraser
2010-07-28 9:30 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-28 11:39 ` [PATCH] libxl: move blktap specific code into libxl_blktap.c Christoph Egger
2010-07-29 15:02 ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-29 15:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-07-29 15:41 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-29 15:46 ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-29 15:48 ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-29 16:46 ` [PATCH] libxl: move blktap-specific " Christoph Egger
2010-07-29 18:02 ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-30 8:40 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-30 8:45 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] libxl: portiblity fixes Ian Jackson
2010-07-28 9:49 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:17 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 16:30 ` Ian Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007261805.06746.Christoph.Egger@amd.com \
--to=christoph.egger@amd.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).