xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: blktap2 portiblity fixes
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:05:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007261805.06746.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19533.41294.111030.339525@mariner.uk.xensource.com>

On Monday 26 July 2010 16:53:02 Ian Jackson wrote:
> Christoph Egger writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: blktap2 portiblity 
fixes"):
> > Can you use the c/s numbers, please?
>
> Changeset numbers are not guaranteed to be meaningful outside a
> particular tree, particularly in the presence of merges.
>
> > It was not necessary to backout c/s 21834 as this wasn't the root cause.
>
> I think by 21834 you mean 24277e3237ca.

No, c/s 21834 has the hash e76befc7fe2d.

> Looking at this patch it's difficult to review and test and there are
> some things I would like to see improved.  Can I ask you to try to
> split the patch up into separate pieces ?
>
> At the very least, please separate out the following:
>   * Adding new interfaces, ie introucing new functions and putting
>     code into those functions and replacing it at the original site
>     with a call;
>   * Const-correctness
>   * Code motion between files, and creation of libxl_linux.c;
>   * Provide libxl_netbsd.c and associated Makefile changes to
>     disable blktap2 on netbsd
>   * #include portability fixes for openpty, pty.h etc.

That's doable but I don't see if a standalone const-correctness
patch makes sense just to make gcc happy with an other patch.

> > diff -r 2b768d52bc7f tools/libxl/libxl_bootloader.c
> > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_bootloader.c	Sun Jul 25 22:20:47 2010 +0100
> > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_bootloader.c	Mon Jul 26 12:41:02 2010 +0200
> > @@ -15,9 +15,16 @@
> >  #include "libxl_osdeps.h"
> >
> >  #include <string.h>
> > -#include <pty.h>
> >  #include <unistd.h>
> >  #include <fcntl.h>
> > +#include <termios.h>
> > +#if defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__OpenBSD__)
> > +#include <util.h>
> > +#elif defined(__linux__)
> > +#include <pty.h>
> > +#elif defined(__sun__)
> > +#include <stropts.h>
> > +#endif
>
> This should be done by moving the relevant #includes to osdep.h, where
> all this kind of thing should be done.

Should this header be re-used by tools/console/daemon/io.c ?
If yes, where is the best place to put osdep.h ?

>
> > -int device_physdisk_major_minor(char *physpath, int *major, int *minor)
> > +int device_physdisk_major_minor(const char *physpath, int *major, int
> > *minor)
>
> This change should be separated out.

hg record is your friend.

Christoph


-- 
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-26 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-20 16:31 [PATCH] libxl: blktap2 portiblity fixes Christoph Egger
2010-07-20 16:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-07-21  8:32   ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-23 12:30     ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-07-23 18:05     ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-26 10:56       ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-26 14:53         ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-26 15:00           ` Ian Campbell
2010-07-26 15:12             ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-26 16:01               ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-26 16:05           ` Christoph Egger [this message]
2010-07-26 16:36             ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-27 12:07               ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:15               ` [PATCH 1/6] libxl: " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:16                 ` [PATCH 2/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:17                   ` [PATCH 3/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:18                     ` [PATCH 4/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:20                       ` [PATCH 5/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:21                         ` [PATCH 6/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 17:00                         ` [PATCH 5/6] " Ian Jackson
2010-07-28  9:17                           ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 16:58                       ` [PATCH 4/6] " Ian Jackson
2010-07-28 11:50                         ` Christoph Egger
     [not found]                     ` <19535.3166.214153.676101@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
2010-07-28 11:42                       ` [PATCH] libxl: compile fix Christoph Egger
2010-07-28 12:22                         ` Ian Campbell
2010-07-28 13:03                           ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 16:34                   ` [PATCH 2/6] libxl: portiblity fixes Ian Jackson
2010-07-28  9:06                     ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-28  9:21                       ` Keir Fraser
2010-07-28  9:30                         ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-28 11:39                     ` [PATCH] libxl: move blktap specific code into libxl_blktap.c Christoph Egger
2010-07-29 15:02                       ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-29 15:08                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-07-29 15:41                         ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-29 15:46                           ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-29 15:48                           ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-29 16:46                             ` [PATCH] libxl: move blktap-specific " Christoph Egger
2010-07-29 18:02                               ` Ian Jackson
2010-07-30  8:40                                 ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-30  8:45                                   ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 16:31                 ` [PATCH 1/6] libxl: portiblity fixes Ian Jackson
2010-07-28  9:49                   ` Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 12:17               ` [PATCH 0/6] " Christoph Egger
2010-07-27 16:30                 ` Ian Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201007261805.06746.Christoph.Egger@amd.com \
    --to=christoph.egger@amd.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).