From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@novell.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>,
Daniel Stodden <Daniel.Stodden@citrix.com>,
Dante Cinco <dantecinco@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, tap: vs. tap2:
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:11:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100802121152.GJ5342@reaktio.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C8743FD7.1BABA%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 07:48:39AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 27/07/2010 07:21, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> >>> That sounds like a lot of fallout on xen-users.
> >>> Especially for people who just want their guests to boot.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe the whole notation should have rather been some _optional_ blktap
> >>> = {1|2} cfg key, only for those who actually care?
> >>
> >> FWIW, I completely agree with this.
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, especially when blktap2 is the only available on in pvops dom0 kernels..
> > All the users have tap:something in their cfgfiles currently..
>
> Well the patch to make the distinction is currently in xen-unstable and
> xen-4.0. Should it be reverted from one or both? Actually it is up to IanJ
> or Stefano to decide on that now.
>
Now when Xen 4.0.1-rc5 is out I guess this should be decided shortly..
-- Pasi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-02 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-19 21:27 BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed Dante Cinco
2010-07-20 2:30 ` Daniel Stodden
2010-07-22 0:11 ` Dante Cinco
2010-07-22 2:02 ` Daniel Stodden
2010-07-22 16:59 ` Dante Cinco
2010-07-22 20:11 ` Daniel Stodden
2010-07-22 20:46 ` Dante Cinco
2010-07-22 21:10 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-07-23 7:07 ` Keir Fraser
2010-07-25 9:27 ` Daniel Stodden
2010-07-25 9:42 ` Keir Fraser
2010-07-26 10:36 ` Ian Campbell
2010-07-27 6:21 ` BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, tap: vs. tap2: Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-07-27 6:48 ` Keir Fraser
2010-08-02 12:11 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen [this message]
2010-08-12 16:18 ` tap: vs. tap2: for Xen 4.0.1 Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-08-13 15:18 ` BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, tap: vs. tap2: Ian Jackson
2010-08-15 14:46 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100802121152.GJ5342@reaktio.net \
--to=pasik@iki.fi \
--cc=Daniel.Stodden@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=dantecinco@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jfehlig@novell.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).