From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36? Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:22:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20100805152225.GA7146@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20100604223929.GA8819@orion.carnet.hr> <4C099836.1050903@goop.org> <20100607074811.GV17817@reaktio.net> <20100607083201.GA16443@orion.carnet.hr> <20100607145743.GB5085@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20100804194457.GA6914@orion.carnet.hr> <20100804201100.GA16839@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20100804213848.GA32402@orion.carnet.hr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100804213848.GA32402@orion.carnet.hr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Josip Rodin Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:38:48PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:11:00PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > But in the latter you wrote that you don't expect #2 to get in the 2.6.36 > > > merge window. Why? I saw a single tentative complaint from hpa on one > > > > No. The #2 is right now brewing in linux-next and I am thinking to ask > > Linus to pull it next week. > > > > > particular patch, but at the end of that subthread you all agreed that it > > > was acceptable because it's small and no worse than the currently included > > > code. Do you expect Linus to ignore the pull request because of that, or? > > > > It is #3 that I am not expecting to get in 2.6.36 merge window, b/c > > well, I just posted it now for review and the runway is way to short for > > that. > > > > But now re-reading my email " patches utilize the Xen-SWIOTLB library > > (http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/27/246) and I don't expect them to > > get in the 2.6.36 merge window." it does sound like I am refering to > > Xen-SWIOTLB, which is not what I meant. Argh. Thanks for noticing it. > > Oh, no, thank you for the quick clarification :) > > OK, so if #1 and #2 will hopefully get in by the time the merge window > closes (within two weeks time), the opportunity for core/dom0 is effectively Aug 14/15th. > closed for .36? Yes.