From: Josip Rodin <joy@entuzijast.net>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36?
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 00:50:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100807225051.GA25945@orion.carnet.hr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100805152225.GA7146@phenom.dumpdata.com>
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:22:25AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > OK, so if #1 and #2 will hopefully get in by the time the merge window
> > closes (within two weeks time), the opportunity for core/dom0 is effectively
>
> Aug 14/15th.
>
> > closed for .36?
>
> Yes.
OK, so PV PCI pass-through and PV ticket locks are at least definitely
planned to be submitted for inclusion in .37?
I skimmed the previous two dom0 upstreaming to-do lists in presentations,
and I'd appreciate it if someone could provide some more current information
regarding them:
* is the code in xen/dom0/acpi-next and xen/dom0/apic-next, nowadays part
of xen/stable, upstreamable per se, or are there still parts of that
which would be objectionable upstream?
* is the PAT issue resolved? I can't seem to find the patch disabling it
in xen/stable any more, so it looks like it's no longer an issue, but
maybe I just looked in the wrong place.
* what happened to the PG_FOREIGN issue - xen/stable still has it in the
original (.18) form? From what I can see, it's for marking memory pages
for/from some other Xen domain, presumably for netback performance etc.
Could this be e.g. ripped out in a separate branch that would just allow
for the upstreaming of the rest of dom0 code?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-07 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-04 22:39 upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36? Josip Rodin
2010-06-05 0:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-05 12:51 ` Josip Rodin
2010-06-06 0:36 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-06 7:36 ` upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36? PV on HVM Xen Boris Derzhavets
2010-06-07 7:48 ` upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36? Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-06-07 8:32 ` Josip Rodin
2010-06-07 14:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-07 15:24 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-06-07 16:15 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-07 17:12 ` Josip Rodin
2010-06-07 18:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-07 18:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-08 7:57 ` Failure to start xend with 2.6.32.15 (c2cb3df04eb3ff68d0de102b2acacc9b8616e659) under Xen 4.0 Boris Derzhavets
2010-06-08 17:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-04 19:44 ` upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36? Josip Rodin
2010-08-04 20:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-08-04 21:09 ` Łukasz Oleś
2010-08-04 21:38 ` Josip Rodin
2010-08-05 15:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-08-07 22:50 ` Josip Rodin [this message]
2010-08-08 1:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-07 16:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100807225051.GA25945@orion.carnet.hr \
--to=joy@entuzijast.net \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).