From: Wei Wang2 <wei.wang2@amd.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: robert.richter@amd.com,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xenoprofile: Add IBS support
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:44:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008101444.49811.wei.wang2@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C600577020000780000ED13@vpn.id2.novell.com>
On Monday 09 August 2010 13:41:11 Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 30.07.10 at 15:28, Wei Wang2 <wei.wang2@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> >--- a/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_files.c
> >+++ b/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_files.c
> >@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> > #include "oprof.h"
> >
> > unsigned long fs_buffer_size = 131072;
> >-unsigned long fs_cpu_buffer_size = 8192;
> >+unsigned long fs_cpu_buffer_size = 131072;
>
> Why is this needed at all, why this much of an increase, and why not
> conditional upon CONFIG_XEN?
>
> Jan
Hi Jan
I had observed over 50% samples lose using following configuration:
opcontrol --start --event=IBS_OP_ALL:50000 --no-vmlinux
if fs_cpu_buffer_size = 8192. The same issue was also seen on native 2.6.34
kernel. In my case, extending fs_cpu_buffer_size or increasing sampling
period can fix this issue.
Since each IBS_OP sample will occupy 14 entries in cpu buffer compared with
only 1 entry for event-based sample, I suspect that the default size of
per-cpu buffer would not be enough for IBS_OP mode in minimum sampling period
(50000). I simply extended fs_cpu_buffer_size just to make sure it works for
current userland tools. If we intent to force a longer minimum sampling
period for IBS_OP_ALL in future release of tools, we could keep
fs_cpu_buffer_size = 8192.
Thanks,
Wei
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-10 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-30 13:28 [PATCH 2/2] xenoprofile: Add IBS support Wei Wang2
2010-08-09 11:41 ` Jan Beulich
2010-08-10 12:44 ` Wei Wang2 [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201008101444.49811.wei.wang2@amd.com \
--to=wei.wang2@amd.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).