From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: Xen max supported memory per guest VM? Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 00:30:19 +0300 Message-ID: <20100814213019.GX2804@reaktio.net> References: <20100814184248.GW2804@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:18:11PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 14/08/2010 19:42, "Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen" wrote: >=20 > > Hello, > >=20 > > In http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0 we mention the following: > > "Better performance and scalability: 128 vcpus per guest, 1 TB of RAM= per > > host, 128 physical CPUs per host (as a default, can be compile-time i= ncreased > > to lots more)." > >=20 > > But what's the max supported amount of memory for a (64bit) guest? >=20 > Allocating the whole 1TB should work. It's unlikely to have been tested > though. >=20 Ok. I guess it might also have a difference if it's a PV or HVM guest.. -- Pasi