From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brendan Cully Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Remus breaks the build Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:03:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20100819000348.GA9702@kremvax.cs.ubc.ca> References: <4C6493ED.3040605@goop.org> <20100813194217.GA6981@kremvax.cs.ubc.ca> <4C65B5A5.8020202@goop.org> <20100818202650.GD2411@kremvax.cs.ubc.ca> <4C6C729A.7030206@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C6C729A.7030206@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wednesday, 18 August 2010 at 16:54, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 08/18/2010 01:26 PM, Brendan Cully wrote: > > That's more git than I've learned. Would a patch suffice? (even > > producing the diff was non-obvious. It turns out that git add foo; git > > diff doesn't include the diff for foo!) > > What's the origin of the code? Do they have a git tree (I seem to > remember one). I can pull from that, then apply any local patches you > may have. You're probably remembering IMQ, which was a big ugly third-party module but is no longer necessary, since we can now use IFB. The little patch I just sent (attached to the last message) was written by me. It's just a little queueing disciple for buffering outbound traffic until an rtnetlink message releases it. It's against whatever pvops tree xen-unstable pulls down (xen/master, I guess). Does that patch suffice?