From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] vtpm Mini-Os domain: mini-os defines Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:39:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20100825153929.GX5341@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> References: <4C753378.9070200@jhuapl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C753378.9070200@jhuapl.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Matthew Fioravante Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org The principle is probably useful indeed. Matthew Fioravante, le Wed 25 Aug 2010 11:15:04 -0400, a =E9crit : > This patch adds some #defines to mini-os > NO_BLKFRONT I tend to frown upon "negative" flags, as they're less readable. I know that using "positive" will require adding them to all other stubdom projects, but it's probably still better that way: we'll realize for instance that pv-grub doesn't actually need pcifront :) samuel