From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add grant references for fbfront/kbdfront Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:51:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20110107195144.GA28677@dumpdata.com> References: <1294416779-13833-1-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov> <20110107165130.GC23825@dumpdata.com> <4D27538C.2070600@tycho.nsa.gov> <20110107192115.GC27871@dumpdata.com> <4D276A3D.8040604@tycho.nsa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D276A3D.8040604@tycho.nsa.gov> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Daniel De Graaf Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 02:32:13PM -0500, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > On 01/07/2011 02:21 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:55:24PM -0500, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > >> On 01/07/2011 11:51 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:12:56AM -0500, dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov wrote: > >>>> This series fixes the interface for the fbfront and kbdfront devices, > >>>> which were storing MFNs in xenstore rather than creating grant table > >>>> entries. To maintain backwards compatibility, a different xenstore key > >>>> is used (page-gref instead of page-ref) and the use of grants must be > >>>> requested for fbfront (because two levels of page references are > >>>> embedded within the shared page). This makes it possible to move a > >>>> display server out of dom0 without giving the display domain full > >>>> access to other domain's memory. > >>> > >>> So these patches go on top of xen/stable-2.6.32 tree right? > >>> > >> > >> They apply to either 2.6.32 or 2.6.37; I have tested them on both. > > > > What is the 2.6.37 branch you applied it to? Can you point me to the > > git tree? Or a set of patches that need to be applied on top of ftp.kernel.org > > virgin 2.6.37? > > > > It should apply on top of any 2.6.37 tree; I sent the patches from a They do. The mail file I had with your name had patches for 2.6.32 which did not apply on 2.6.37. Sorry about the noise.