From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH V2] Add libxenlight driver Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:09:07 +0000 Message-ID: <20110223110907.GB26589@redhat.com> References: <1298429765-24170-1-git-send-email-jfehlig@novell.com> <4D64E829.5070107@redhat.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D64E829.5070107@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Jim Fehlig , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:57:45AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 02/23/2011 03:56 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > >Add a new xen driver based on libxenlight [1], which is the primary > >toolstack starting with Xen 4.1.0. The driver is stateful, runs > >privileged only, and is accessed with libxl:/// URI. > > Why not let the user keep xen:/// ? The functionality available in the original driver vs the new driver will not be entirely the same, so I think it is important to have them be distinct to avoid any confusion on part of developers and/or bug triagers and/or users. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|