From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] pvops: Make suspend work when
	CONFIG_SUSPEND=n
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:56:10 -0500
Message-ID: <20110304155610.GD8391@dumpdata.com>
References: <AANLkTikcbVEXdRsS1WYCNTinuYLcmiJ1dz2ReS18_A+3@mail.gmail.com>
	<1299238501.6552.295.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
	<AANLkTikOb2n7bq=w9RMdN7_NqR5UTom=ed+GuS8QyL_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<1299239542.6552.302.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
	<AANLkTi=iQs4J8p+ix2i0OcY_63EKUB968NeBHVxts6P+@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=iQs4J8p+ix2i0OcY_63EKUB968NeBHVxts6P+@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@cs.ubc.ca>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>, Frank Pan <frankpzh@gmail.com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:42:00AM -0800, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:45 +0000, Frank Pan wrote:
> >> > AFAIK the conclusion is that an approach which ensures both
> >> > XEN_SAVE_RESTORE and SUSPEND (actually HIBERNATE after the above
> >> > discussion) are enable when necessary (by making the former depend on
> >> > the later) is what is going to be taken.
> >>
> >> That's good. How long will it be committed on pvops trees?
> >
> > I don't know. Stefano, Rafael and Shriram are taking care of it AFAIK.
> >
> Well, from my side, I am waiting on Stefano & Rafael. The discussion seemed
> to have ended with "lets wait for the code to settle", though there seemed to be
> no consensus regarding the need to enable HIBERNATE for XEN_SAVE_RESTORE
> to work.
>  Someone suggested creating a new user visible hibernate symbol that would
> solve this issue and make the main hibernate logic depend on this symbol rather
> than the HIBERNATE symbol. I could certainly spin up a patch for that but nobody
> seemed to have reached a conclusion.

Please do. I was under the understanding that we were waiting for a victi^H^H^Hvolunteer
to implement that.

That was the only thing gatting your patchset going in.