xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Tom Goetz <tom.goetz@virtualcomputer.com>
Subject: Re: Merging xen/dom0/backend/blktap2  ..
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:53:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110315195351.GA3600@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300193046.3476.9806.camel@ramone.fritz.box>

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 05:44:06AM -0700, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 05:39 -0500, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 03:31 -0500, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 03:33 +0000, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> > > > is an overall pita and I've had the pleasure several times now.
> > > 
> > > Merging it into what? xen/stable-2.6.32.x or some newer upstream version
> > > based tree?
> > 
> > Newer upstream. Otherwise I wouldn't bother. It's certainly not a common
> > operation, I was just suprised how much garbage is involved.
> 
> After looking at the series, I think reverting on that topic branch
> might just risk more issues in trees which already pulled the current
> branch, and gathering the right diffs from Jeremy's tree to avoid that
> would probably take me longer than it's worth. More time than I can
> afford.
> 
> Since Konrad already seems to do the same with blkback, I'd like to
> propose a reset.
> 
> Please check out one of the following trees at
> http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb/?p=people/dstodden/linux.git;a=summary
> git://xenbits.xensource.com/people/dstodden/linux.git
> 
> blktap/next-2.6.38
> blktap/next-2.6.37
> blktap/next-2.6.36
> blktap/next-2.6.33
> blktap/next-2.6.32
> 
> I'd redo xen/dom0/backend/blktap2 and repost the diffs sent around last
> week. I wouldn't mind keeping that branch in sync too, assuming it
> helps.
> 
> Trees above start at v2.6.32, with the transition to
> drivers/block/blktap, and moving on with Linus' tree from there on.
> Versions chosen above are where forward ports were necessary,
> respectively. Only fuzz left is mm/memory.c (export zap_page_range for
> modules).

Can you make a different branch (or just send me the git commit)
for the one that touches mm/memory.c?

> 
> Does this sound acceptable?

I looked briefly at blktap/next-2.6.38 and it looks like an ongoing
merge tree. Can you make a tree that is based off 2.6.38 (or some
branch of my 'stable/' ones). Basically trying to have something that is
easy to merge and is self-containted within one branch.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-15 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-10  3:33 Merging xen/dom0/backend/blktap2 Daniel Stodden
2011-03-10  8:31 ` Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 10:39   ` Daniel Stodden
2011-03-10 18:24     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-10 21:57       ` Daniel Stodden
2011-03-11 19:35         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-11 22:02           ` Daniel Stodden
2011-03-15 12:44     ` Daniel Stodden
2011-03-15 19:53       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-03-15 21:04         ` Daniel Stodden
2011-03-16  0:43           ` Daniel Stodden
2011-03-16  0:50             ` Daniel Stodden
2011-03-16  3:02           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-19 23:20             ` Daniel Stodden
2011-03-20 20:28               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-21  1:05                 ` Daniel Stodden
2011-03-22 16:59                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-22 19:17                     ` Daniel Stodden
     [not found] <4d791af5.493cdc0a.174a.ffff9bfeSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com>
2011-03-14 12:29 ` Thomas Goetz
2011-03-14 21:05   ` Daniel Stodden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110315195351.GA3600@dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=daniel.stodden@citrix.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=tom.goetz@virtualcomputer.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).