From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: if hvm better than pv?why dd in hvm vm no larger
	than 50M, while pv greater than 50
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:36:04 -0400
Message-ID: <20110425133604.GB9192@dumpdata.com>
References: <3bc61657.3db6.12f8153cdc5.Coremail.ooolinux@163.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3bc61657.3db6.12f8153cdc5.Coremail.ooolinux@163.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: yue <ooolinux@163.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 03:47:23PM +0800, yue wrote:
> 1.if passthrough pci  is default in hvm?  pv disk throughput better than hvm,using dd test
> thanks

Please write your question more clearly. I am having a hard time understanding what it
is that you are asking.