From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Re: if hvm better than pv?why dd in hvm vm no larger than 50M, while pv greater than 50 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:54:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20110426135421.GE26275@dumpdata.com> References: <20110425133604.GB9192@dumpdata.com> <3bc61657.3db6.12f8153cdc5.Coremail.ooolinux@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: yue Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 04:48:31PM +0800, yue wrote: > 1.i find pv disk'throughput is better than hvm. i want to know why? Pick up "The definitive guide to the Xen hypervisor" book. > 2.pci passthrough is said to improve performance, if it is default method of IO-process. Sure. But it also makes migration difficult. > 3.do you familar with ocfs2's source code? No.