From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastian Blank Subject: Re: libxenstore from 4.1 incompatible with xenstore from 4.0 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:49:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20110429194907.GA23062@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> References: <20110411134129.GA18106@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <19875.5820.171884.484139@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20110411150512.GA19871@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <19875.6905.429984.561590@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20110411155044.GA20638@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <19877.52100.904068.231029@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19877.52100.904068.231029@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 05:12:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Bastian Blank writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] libxenstore from 4.1 incompatible with xenstore from 4.0"): > > Take Xen 4.0 and the libxenstore from 4.1 and see if it still works. > You're using the new libxenstore with older versions of the calling > programs from the xen-4.0 tree ? I'm using libxenstore and the xenstore utils from 4.1 and xenstored plus hypervisor from 4.0. > I don't think this is a support > combination. Well. The abiname of libxenstore tells a different story. Bastian -- "Beauty is transitory." "Beauty survives." -- Spock and Kirk, "That Which Survives", stardate unknown