From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: John Weekes <lists.xen@nuclearfallout.net>,
ke.yu@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com
Cc: mark.langsdorf@amd.com,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
winston.l.wang@intel.com, gang.wei@intel.com
Subject: Re: Performance difference between Xen versions
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 15:36:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110502193623.GB14666@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DBF0306.8040000@nuclearfallout.net>
> # xenpm get-cpufreq-para 5
> cpu id : 5
> affected_cpus : 5
> cpuinfo frequency : max [2268000] min [1600000] cur [2268000]
> scaling_driver : acpi-cpufreq
> scaling_avail_gov : userspace performance powersave ondemand
> current_governor : ondemand
> ondemand specific :
> sampling_rate : max [10000000] min [10000] cur [20000]
> up_threshold : 80
> scaling_avail_freq : *2268000 2267000 2133000 2000000 1867000
> 1733000 1600000
> scaling frequency : max [2268000] min [1600000] cur [2268000]
> turbo mode : enabled
>
> Does it do it silently? If so, how can I see the true frequency?
<looks aroud> You are asking me I presume?
Ummm, no idea. I would actually email the authors of the those patches (CC-ed here).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-29 12:32 Performance difference between Xen versions Juergen Gross
2011-04-29 13:28 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-29 13:35 ` Juergen Gross
2011-04-29 14:58 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-29 16:10 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-02 5:31 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 6:41 ` Keir Fraser
2011-05-02 7:23 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-02 8:00 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 8:15 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-02 8:23 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 8:49 ` Keir Fraser
2011-05-03 3:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-06 13:49 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-06 14:27 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-11 6:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-11 6:23 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 17:52 ` John Weekes
2011-05-02 18:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-02 18:43 ` John Weekes
2011-05-02 19:16 ` John Weekes
2011-05-02 19:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-05-02 19:54 ` John Weekes
2011-05-03 2:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-03 3:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-03 3:39 ` John Weekes
2011-05-03 7:23 ` Tian, Kevin
[not found] ` <4DBF13BB.3000309@nuclearfallout.net>
2011-05-03 7:23 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110502193623.GB14666@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
--cc=ke.yu@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=lists.xen@nuclearfallout.net \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=winston.l.wang@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).