From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: full featured, fully bug-fix pv-ops branch? Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 17:06:53 -0400 Message-ID: <20110509210653.GB29498@dumpdata.com> References: <4DC7F72B020000780004064E@vpn.id2.novell.com> <20110509130740.GC32595@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110509130740.GC32595@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:07:40PM +0300, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:16:11PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > Jeremy, Konrad, > >=20 > > stumbling over this once in a while (this time looking for where Domi= nic's > > "blktap: Fix reference to freed struct request" patch ended up, witho= ut > > any success so far) I wonder what pv-ops branch(es) is (are) supposed > > to be the one(s) (e.g.) distros ought to use - that is, fully feature= d (at > > least as far as non-experimental features go) *and* fully bug-fixed. We should talk then - I did not want to commit to a specific branch=20 b/c I wasn't sure which one the majority of the distors would want to settle one. There is a pretty good bug-fixed (thanks to Virtual Computer) and mostly featured (blkback, netback, blktap2) branch that I was thinking to setup and start upstreaming the pieces. > >=20 > > The branches XenParavirtOps on the wiki points to don't seem to be th= e > > ones (some of them seem not to have a blktap implementation at all), > > and gathering bits from various people's private trees can't be the > > ultimate solution... > >=20 >=20 > Afaik Jeremy's xen.git xen/stable-2.6.32.x is supposed to be the > long-term stable branch, following upstream kernel.org long-term branch= . >=20 > -- Pasi >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel